OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
89787470

Oh, the ID walkthrough must've changed: that makes sense because I saw the same issue with another new contributor on Sunday.
Thanks for letting me know and for the corrections!
:)

89863537

Wow, you must have some pretty nifty equipment to get centimetre accuracy for building/roof heights! (I'm guessing you're a professional?)
Specifically on the Academy, did you survey the separate parts of the building? If so - or even if not - you could use the building:part=yes tag on a separate area, to indicate the heights on only that section with the skillion roof shape.
Happy mapping,
Jez

89787470

Hi oldguit, welcome to OpenStreetMap!
I noticed you moved the corners of two buildings here which has resulted in the walls not being right-angles. I encourage you to continue the ID editor walkthrough which explains about squaring buildings (shortcut "Q")
Happy mapping,
Jez

89800898

Hi nathank096, welcome to OpenStreetMap! I encourage you to continue the ID editor walkthough, particularly the section on squaring buildings (shortcut "Q")
Happy mapping,
Jez

89360441

Hi mkroberts1954,
By deleting the existing seamarks and replacing them, you've removed the fog horns that were mapped - do you know where they are now?
I also note your addition of yellow lights to *ALL* the turbines instead of just the four corner ones as before - seems unlikely to me but perhaps you have other information?
Regards,
Jez

87398521

Hi Ken. There's no need to delete the whole thing, in fact editing existing objects is preferred in order to keep histories.
Yes you'd need to edit each line separately. (Note: It's quite common for streets to be split into segments for various reasons, here simply because of the shape).
There's no need to apologise - it's good to have your local knowledge. Be bold!
Jez

87472674

Thank you for your quick response. Looks good!

87398521

Hi KenH-S, welcome to OpenStreetMap!
I see you requested a review: the information you've added is useful, but would be better added to the line of the street instead of one point. Just let me know if I can be of help. I've got ideas for other improvements needed around this area too, but I don't visit Guisborough that often.
Happy mapping :)
Jez

87472674

Hi mot_tom,
Just wondering why you've deleted a residential street in Stillington: way/720142240? Both Maxar and Esri World imagery clearly show houses being constructed here.
Happy mapping,
Jez

86715898

Hi pravalg, on the latest aerial imagery here (Esri World) the two highways you've added no longer exist - it looks to me like they were only temporary during the construction.
Happy mapping,
Jez

86130304

Hi lordmirg, welcome to OSM!
I see you requested a review and your edit looks good. Hard to believe that no-one had spotted the incorrect name before now!
Happy mapping :)
Jez

85305488

Hi Dan, welcome to OSM!
I see you've requested a review - you've made a great start with tracing the buildings but there are a couple more steps to refine the outlines:
1) 'Squaring' (shortcut: Q) each building to make the corners right-angles.
2) Move (shortcut: M) each outline to ground floor level.
Happy mapping :)
Jez

84674093

Hi TeessideMapper,
What on-the-ground evidence is there that 'Hartwell' exists as a suburb, and a suburb of where? I'm sure you're aware the wikipedia page for Hartwell was deleted due to lack of notability - and was subject to much edit-warring over naming prior to deletion - whereas most other areas of Stockton-on-Tees still retain their wiki pages. I note the later anonymous edit to the Hartburn wiki page to claim that Hartwell is part of Hartburn (a suburb of a suburb?) but named Queensgate, though what about Low Hartburn in between?
I hope you can clarify the situation.
Kind regards,
Jez

83380027

Ahh, I didn't realise there was other options like addr:village because the wiki only mentions addr:city for the place name. Thanks.

83380027

Hi CjMalone,
addr:city=Saltburn ??? I'm assuming OSM copies RM's 'post towns' for addr:city fields? I know I'm relatively new to the project, but it seems to me that just because a private company uses a town 10 miles away for its address database doesn't mean OSM should be following their format, though I'm happy to be corrected if that is the agreed method.
Happy mapping,
Jez

82878827

Hi Joe E, thank you for adding/amending these routes. For your info, the Transpennine at Redcar Central both arrives at AND departs from platform 2. (Between arrival/departure it shunts into the goods line behind Morrisons to let the Northern service to Saltburn past).
Keep up the good work!
Jez

82281955

Hi MacLondon, Stagecarriage went out of business last year so this route no longer exists. NB. Many bus relations in Teesside are out-of-date due to annual route changes by the current operators and lack of mappers + lack of motivation to redraw them all every time!
Kind regards, Jez

82206941

Hi Wibblejunior, thank you for adding the X93 route to OSM. I have a query though - when I travelled on this route last summer it went through Aislaby. Is it missing out Aislaby now?
Kind regards,
Jez

81695173

Hi chris_debian, regarding your change of waterway=riverbank -> natural=water + water=river, just wondered if this is something iD enforces? (I note the riverbank tag is used more often worldwide).
Kind regards, Jez

81647483

Hi Joe E, can I query your edit to way/389104518. I'd noticed a different (non-local) mapper make a semi-automated edit from Lloyds TBS -> Lloyds Bank a few months ago but was unsure about that because it closed a few years ago for redevelopment and wasn't on the bank's website - https://www.gazettelive.co.uk/news/teesside-news/work-begins-turning-former-lloyds-13917547 - however I didn't query it at the time, thinking I might survey it myself later, but I don't visit Middlesbrough that often.
Are you able to confirm if Lloyds have re-opened a branch in the building?
Kind regards, Jez.