What's your source for Kentucky pipeline data?

Just checking on the sources here -- I presume it's from the "Texas Railroad Commision website" like your other (good!) work in Texas? If you remember any more details about where the pipeline data is on the website, that'd be very welcome.

More importantly than a wiki page -- how did you find out the routes of these pipelines? They aren't visible in imagery, as far as I can tell.

I see you added an underground pipeline in this changeset ( way/1063679577 ) -- where did you source the route from?

Nice work adding all these underground pipelines! Where did you find a freely-licensed source for them, and what is that source?

Do you happen to remember the source you used for these undersea communications cables?

This looks like an import -- and a neat one! Where's the wiki page about it?

Makes sense, thanks! Someone (you, if you're willing) should make a wiki page documenting this, so people can be more confident in deleting them (or at least, the hires=yes ones -- there are various hires=no ones out there, which it seems may still be useful).

I'm not familiar with the "hires" tag, and it doesn't seem to be documented on the wiki. Could you say more about where you heard about it, and what you meant by adding it?

Please consider making future edits like this in smaller, individual changesets, to avoid covering such a large area with the bounding box.

I can't actually tell if this pier is signed as a place where "boats are explicitly permitted to moor" as it says on the wiki for mooring=* -- but it's clear from the aerial images that it satisfies the criteria at man_made=pier

That line is also a pier, very clearly, though. I think whoever added it previously just didn't mark it as such.

Thanks for correcting this! It seems clear that there used to be some small driveway here, but that it doesn't exist anymore. There are lots of other things to update and add to the map, we'd be glad to have your help with anything else that you come across.

Welcome to editing OpenStreetMap -- we're glad to have your help! I'm a bit confused by some of the changes you made here, though. You removed a more detailed outline of house at the corner of Princeton and Alpine, replacing it with a simplier shape that doesn't seem to match the aerial imagery. Could you explain where you got that from?

Please don't use layer=parking_aisle ; the correct tag is service_parking_aisle . I've changed it.

Please don't use layer=parking_aisle ; the correct tag is service_parking_aisle . I've changed it.

Please don't use layer=parking_aisle ; the correct tag is service_parking_aisle . I've changed it.

Ah, my mistake about the hotel -- I see that more recent images do show it has been turned into a CVS, so thank you for updating that.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116667172

While marking the larger area as landuse=retail is welcome, please don't remove the tagging of the Cooperstown Motel in the process.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116667172

Thanks for adding all this detail, but please use more distinct and descriptive changeset comments -- merely saying which imagery you used is redundant with the automatically added imagery_used key, and doesn't facilitate people distinguishing one changeset from another.