JessAk71's Notes
Notes submitted or commented on by JessAk71
| Id | Creator | Description | Created at | Last changed | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3503180 | JessAk71 | the node poi and tags on building here could be merged but the building has different address than the node so some work on harmonizing the two are needed |
|||
| 2590257 | JessAk71 | Amsterdam town node: node/3329813669 looks like a duplicate of this better placed town node: node/158851239 suggest removing node/3329813669 to remove duplicate |
|||
| 2526729 | JessAk71 | pretty sure this office poi node/7496609906 does not belong here inside the courthouse... suggest moving it to correct location |
|||
| 3444734 | JessAk71 | suggest adding relation or area for these chalets to remove duplicate information |
|||
| 1841566 | JessAk71 | this street in some developer maps here say this is called 'Town Square Place' can someone confirm on the ground? |
|||
| 2769087 | JessAk71 | there is now a parking garage here, service roads and parking lots should be updated to reflect the current structure and traffic flow |
|||
| 3995675 | JessAk71 | roadway leading up to and the bridge itself has been changed to access=private but really you can drive on it then turn around once on the island before the gatehouse so I think perhaps access for these roads leading to the gatehouse should not have private access, at a minimum maybe permissive? But it seems that this changeset changeset/142310136 updated it to private based on that the ownership is private which is not the correct use of the access tag. |
|||
| 2407173 | JessAk71 | adding pois for specific ship names at a military base as landuse=military does not seem like the best way to map ship locations... suggest possibly tagging these as ship berths instead? See: seamark:type=berth |
|||
| 1395351 | freebeer | Does the - unmapped - two-lane short drive here, head into or under this block o' flats to give access to the auto parking opposite? not totally in shadow in mapbox.
|
|||
| 4088100 | JessAk71 | roads within this housing development should probably be marked as access=private since the two access roads into the development have signs that read: "Private road no public use or access permitted". Seems public access is not even permissive... |