Hi Russ,

Yes, we are still actively working in Thailand.

-Jeff

Hi Russ,

Thanks for fixing this. It's an easy mistake to make and can be hard to catch. Its hard to tell from the imagery but it seems like there is a connection at the node below between the two roads. Perhaps a pedestrian connection would be appropriate since its narrow?

node/6160380849

Thanks,
Jeff

Hi mueschel,

Sorry about that. The user was doing some cleanup work on our projects using the grid as a reference and accidentally uploaded it. Thanks for cleaning it up.

-Jeff

Yeah its here https://tasks.hotosm.org/project/5170?task=2977#bottom

I've sent them a message explaining the issue and the associated HOT task was invalidated with an explanation so if they do further crisis mapping they will also get a message on the tasking manager.

Hi Tom,

Good catch, I fixed the alignment of that tertiary.

Thanks,
Jeff

Hi Stephan,

I think regardless, the roads should be disconnected as its not clear that the road really connects even in standard.

I upgraded the road to residential as these are significant streets so it seems appropriate. We tend to use service for driveways if there are only a building or two on a short way.

Thanks for the feedback,
Jeff

Hi Beddhist,

You are absolutely correct. I have updated the road types and surface tags.

Thanks for the feedback,
Jeff

Hi Beddhist,

I split the way at the intersection and left the top half as residential. It has a fair number of houses along it so I think the residential tag is justified. The southern half has no houses so I changed it to track.

Thanks for the feedback,
jeff

Hi Beddhist,

I added the unpaved tag in the east part of the road, but that intersection looks correctly like a four way to me. I centered the intersection a bit but left as was. Can you take another look and let me know if you still disagree.

Thanks for the feedback,
Jeff

Hi Stephan,

Agreed, that these don't fit the definition of unclassified despite their surprisingly high road quality. I changed them to track past the residential portion but just removed the surface tag rather than explicitly marking paved as its possible its gravel of some sort.

Thanks as always for the feedback,
Jeff

Hi Stephan,

Yikes, this should have been fixed in the initial publishing and we haven't cleaned up the entire project yet. I have fixed many of the issues in the area and will have this area fully cleaned up ASAP.

Thanks for the feedback,
Jeff

Hi Beddhist,

This bridge was created and tagged by EndlessRoundabout actually.

-Jeff

Hi Beddhist,

We appreciate the positive feedback!

-Jeff

Hi Beddhist,

I restricted the unpaved tag to just the area I could see that was unpaved.

Thanks for feedback,
Jeff

Hi Beddhist,

The imagery is not entirely clear, but in DG standard, the road appears to have been fully paved. Take a look and let me know if you agree.

Thanks for the feedback,
Jeff

Hi Tom,

We originally skipped over this area when you were working in it. We're looping back to it now and this province is in the process of getting published. This issue will get corrected once we do.

Thanks for the feedback,
Jeff

Hi Tom,

Yeah, the editor should have been checked standard where there was cloud cover. I've extended the way now.

Thanks for the feedback,
Jeff

Hi Tom,

Good catch. I made the connection and changed the road to residential.

Thanks for the feedback,
Jeff

Hi Tom,

This is a pretty weird case. It is a surprisingly good quality road but isn't really connecting up two settlements and mostly just seems to be a farm road. I've gone ahead and upgraded though.

Thanks for the feedback,
Jeff