I do not think we can consider this an aerodrome, not even an airstrip, given the lack of a marked out runway, or any other infrastructure. After all, there must be hundreds of places in Europe where aeroplanes occasionally operate even if there is totally no infrastructure. I therefore intend to remove this entry.

What is the source for the ICAO LIQY? I cannot find it anywhere else on the www.

Hehe, so nice to get a quick and positive reply. Much appreciated!
I will go ahead right now.

Thank you for addinng the "area" description of the aerodrome, this is much better than to have it as a node. However we now have two entries for one and the same aerodrome, and that is not good. It is a potential source of future confusion or even errors, and it is contrary to the basic OSM principle of "one feature on the ground, one entry in the database". I there intend to remove the "node" descriptive of the aerodrome, unless some very good argument comes up.
Kind regards!

Apologies for writing in English.
The addition of two "aeroway=aerodrome" nodes at Oran airport is quite incorrect: the aerodrome is already very well mapped as such. Correct would have been to tag them with "aeroway=terminal", and perhaps positioning them at the terminal buildings rather than somewhere in the parking lots. On a side note, you also clobbered up the icao codes versus the iata codes, but do not bother to correct them: they ought to be removed right away.
Excuse me if this sounds negative, your good intentions are beyond doubt; but I am afraid you have committed a couple of "beginners' errors".

Because I am vehemently opposed to that suggestion - there have been various discussions. None countered my arguments, yet few agreed with me. For me, the aera:aeroway=runway should not exist, it is a waste of resources and a source of confusion. I will not stop other people from using it, but you cannot expect me to use it myself :)

Not so nice to brutally remove the aerodrome; much better would have been to add disused: before its tags. I was close to re-adding it, thinking of vandalism!

I intend to revert, this is an incorrect update to an entry that was very well done as it was.

Many thanks! All clear!

Whence comes this icao code LRHR? I cannot find it referenced in the official source https://www.aisro.ro/ !

Good evening! Why are you only now commenting on a change I made several months ago? And, above all, what precisely is your point? The document you refer to is by now well known to me, I download a recent edition every couple of months, and have a procedure to convert it to a spreadsheet table (a la Excel) for easy consultation. Besides, should we spend much effort discussing an aerodrome that is being demolished?
Kind regards!

Hm, that makes me inclined to add a node with "aeroway=airstrip" plus "description=Pathfinder Flying Club Airstrip" or such. Thoughts?

What is the use of this grass runway? RAF glider cadets?

Thanks, it looks good now! I do not understand that you removed the "aeroway=runway", this could well stay in place.

I intend to remove this node, because the aerodrome now has a better description in www.openstreetmap.org/way/1127536904
Comments welcome!

The aerodrome you added - with admirable care for detail! - is not really an aerodrome, its runway is far too short. It seems obvious to me that it is a terrain for model aircraft, these are mapped in a quite different way. Please check the wiki (model_aerodrome) and adjust; or, if you prefer, I will do so, later today or one of the next days.
Meill.sal.,

Yes, it looks beautiful now, thanks again! One detail that I changed is to use "source=" for referring to dlapilota, rather than "website=". This latter would be used to point to the website of the aerodrome operator, perhaps an aeroclub.
Kind regards!

Thank you for adding this little aerodrome! I think the "building=hangar" should be removed from it, a separate entry could be created specifically for the hangar. Also, we need to add a runway.
If you don't object, I will proceed later today, or perhaps tomorrow.

It now looks impeccable. Well done, thank you very much!

Ah, so nice to come to concensus! The most welcome thing to do, if you can manage, is to define the area of the modellers field, probably it is fenced off? Then tag it with "leisure=pitch" and "sport=model_aerodrome" and optionally a referenced name, and a website for the operating club.

On a sidenote, let me apologise for not answering in your Catala language, I have recently moved from Belgium to Portugal and have my hands and my old mind more than occupied with learning that nice but somewhat queer language. But the Catalan sake has its supporters in Belgium (especially in the North) and be assured am I one!