Hi and welcome to OSM,
Are these buildings really called "Casa"?

Hi and welcome to OSM,
It looks like the hospital is already mapped @ way/147906791 ,can you confirm your edits please?

Hi,
Please do not draw random shapes in the box, I have fixed these for you.

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/50895454 where the changeset comment is: Accidental road movement

Hi. Can you confirm the location of this post office?

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/50882441 where the changeset comment is: Adding features that do not exsist

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/50882426 where the changeset comment is: Adding features that do not exsist

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/50882416 where the changeset comment is: Adding features that do not exsist

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/50882399 where the changeset comment is: Adding features that do not exsist

I updated some in an edit of mine, keeping the original tagging and applying highway=footway where it makes sense, thank you.

Hi,
Welcome to OSM and thanks for your contribution.
You mapped "block G" as a residential area, however we use these for towns and cities, it should be either a building or apartments.

Thanks

HI,
Please can you confirm the location of this feature?
Is it really in the middle of the road?

Hi,
Please can you confirm the location of way/175608424 , is this a disused railway?
It just seems that the tagging is either wrong or it is drawn incorrectly, as it goes through numerous buildings and tennis courts.
Thanks

Hi and welcome to OSM,
Just a note, please remember to square buildings after you have drawn them.
You can do this by:
right clicking > square, or pushing "s".
Thanks!

Merhaba ve OSM'ye hoş geldiniz,
Sadece bir not, binaları çizdikten sonra kareler oluşturmayı lütfen unutmayın.
Şunları yapabilirsiniz:
Sağ klikleyerek> kare veya "s" yi iterek.
Teşekkürler!

Hi,
Is there a reason that some buildings have the tag:
"yes=yes"?

Thanks for clearing this up.
James

Sorry for my hastiness, and assuming that this place is non-existent, I will take more time to check next time, and not just delete the point without looking.

Deleted in #50538537

Hi Andy,
I have checked on the map and imagery, and all 135 look to be in plausible locations.
Sorry again for the fuss,
James

Hi Andy,
Sorry for not notifying, I was just going on the basis that the amount being modified was quite low.
I checked most locations, but I will double check them all later today, or I can revert them if you like.
Sorry for the inconvenience
James