Thanks for the question. I'll check this tomorrow. Probably yes. I was in a hurry and only checked the collection times. I'm usually more thorough. :-)

Thanks for doing this, and the other local address fixes. I'd never heard of "addr:parentstreet" before!

Sorry, forgot to add comment. This was just adding more houses and correcting street alignment, etc, to match Cadastral Parcels.

:-) Nice work! Thanks for the update. I agree it's a much safer route than Old London Road. Best regards.

No worries. Thanks for what you're doing. Keep up the great work! My comments were just from observations and because I live locally. Yes it's an interesting read. Pipestems were new to me too. I gather from the OSM wiki that it's a term common in the USA. Personally I've never heard of it as a term in the UK. Please do whatever you feel is right here. It's an unusual road and combination of factors. :-)

Sorry, me again! Possibly "highway=service" and "access=private", since it services multiple properties but is technically a "private drive" (there's a sign at one end saying such). This way routing algorithms should avoid it for through-traffic for motor vehicles, but maybe also add "foot=yes" since it's a legally a public right of way? What do you think?

Hi pole_climber! Well spotted, you're absolutely right it should be a service road, not a track. I'd personally question 'service=driveway'. Perhaps just leave it as highway=service and delete the 'service=driveway'? service=driveway suggests 'driveway' would only service one property, which isn't the case here.

Nice work on this. Just wondering why the tree has an address, or if it's maybe a mistake. Does someone live in it? :-)

Sorry, the title of this changeset was meant to read "Added a missing AED after survey". I forgot to change it from my previous changeset.

Just to add, these were from a survey in person. I have since created the respective buildings and attached the addresses to those buildings.

Interesting point. This particular (small) housing development is essentially complete so on this occasion I have just removed it, leaving your "landuse:residential" areas in tact. They encompass the exact same housing development, so I think it's all good now.

Many thanks for the quick reply. I'll look into it shortly and will update.

Hello ndrw6. Hope you don't mind me asking, there's an area marked as 'landuse=construction' but with other areas of 'landuse=residential' on top. Has construction been completed? Can the construction be removed now or does it need to stay? Thank you in advance. :-)

Oops, didn't add a 'comment' to the changeset. This was to change a recycling container to "glass bottles" instead of "glass" as per Osmose suggestion.

Ah I see! Thanks for the quick reply! I've never been down there myself. I've only ever driven past.

Hi Reb F! Hope you're well. Sorry I'm just wondering if you might have mistakenly got the wrong road here when adding these access tags to Harris Way. I'm not aware of any access restrictions for walking or cycle users. In fact, there's a footpath along the road. Just wondering what your source for this change was? Many thanks.

I can see you're in the process of adding house names and numbers in East Bergholt. Just to let you know I've added some missing houses in the area just to the North of White Horse Road.

I couldn't reply directly to your question in the note as it was closed and I didn't want to reactivate it. Yes the shop is vacant as well as closed. Thanks for updating the map!

Thanks for fixing my mistake! :-)

Just to let you know, I recently visited this estate and was running the Kartaview app while driving, so there's some imagery available on there in case any of its useful.