This edit has been reverted in changeset/126310630 as it marked the Bahamian border as not an administrative border.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126142340

Welcome to OpenStreetMap,
When tracing roof shapes please bear in mind that the objective is to "flatten" the outline vertically down to ground level. Off axis imagery often shows some of the side view of the roof but offsets or kinks on the apparent outline due to the varying height should be corrected back to straight during the flattening.

This page has some hints:
osm.wiki/Roof_modelling#Typical_errors_in_the_interpretation_of_roof_geometry_from_aerial_images

Not Glos obviously. Still traces from imagery.

And back again in 125818909. The edit API is timing out for me at the moment though.

Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

This appears to be the third time a node for this tank has been added here. Have you got the latest map downloaded?

Also the name tag for tank should be the name only. The description of the contents can go in a description tag, or even better using tank specific tags in the advanced part of the OsmAnd editor or with another editor like Vespucci.

osm.wiki/ES:Tag:man_made%3Dstorage_tank

Welcome to OpenStreetMsp.

If you know this because you live nearby we normally say "source=local knowledge".

osm.wiki/ES:Key:source

Didn't mean for these to end up in the same changeset. Sorry about that.

Are these really apartments for tourists or just the building names?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125207016

This changeset contains two entries for Nicole's beauty supplies in different buildings which is correct?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125286519

> Deleting my stuff without caring for anything i wrote because your principles are hurted

It's a bit rich calling this "your stuff" when you have lifted it from another site and don't appear to have even bothered to do the required license checks.

I think you may have put the street in the housenumber box by mistake here.

Cadastral parcels not used of course, surprised an overlay responding only with an error was included in the list.

Pleas save before editing in a completely different area, large bounding boxes can alert many people unnecessarily.

This also seems to have edited a state in Mexico, was that deliberate?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122627235

If possible please try to save between editing widely spaced areas. A large number of people can get notified with big bounding boxes if the bounding box crosses the area they pay attention to.

Is this currently active? If it is a current police station that people can go to rather than an old building that keeps the name then it should normally be tagged as amenity=police.

Should the names for these be put separately on the separate islands?
?

If these roads would still be potentially useful for runners or cyclists it may be good to keep the `abandoned:highway=unclassified` tags but also label them as `highway=footway`. Any physical barriers can be marked on nodes along the way.

barrier=*

I don't think OsmAnd will display liferings unless you specifically enable the POI overlay for "emergency" features. I'm not sure why.

I would think that if changing the classification of the road paralleling the shore it is more likely to be primary or secondary. With the lack of apparent bridges purely residential use is unlikely.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121108540