Oops.

Thanks.

I am curious. What does "us" stands for in this context?

The recently approved waterway=tidal_channel might be appropriate for some of these.

Are you sure that OSM was incorrect for ALL of these? It is reasonably common for signage or documents to simplify spelling and this simplification should be preserved in OSM if official.

Maxar Imagery seems an unlikely source for a road name?

Where did you learn of this usage? The last local mapper explicitly changed this *from* service to track and the aerial imagery shows something that looks very informal.

This appear in neither of the publicly available Maxar sources, do you have a valid source for this geometry?

Note that the previous classification of this road was done by a local mapper who is likely to have visited the road in question.
Do you have streetlevel imagery not cited in your changeset?

I do not think the staff (west) and public (east) car parks were that interconnected when I last used (one of) them. Note also that no publicly available satellite imagery that I have seen reflects the state post Dorian.

You got an updated street name from aerial imagery?

That's a little awkward, OSM normally prefers either explicit permission or statement of a compatible license if the copyright hadn't expired. Any chance of contacting the author?

What was the copyright notice on the brochure?

Funny how the real estate agents disagree huh?

Do you have a source for this name? Mapbox doesn't normally have this sort of information.

Please try to upload frequently enough that changes are on the same continent.

Changeset comment does not compute.

This deletes the wikidata tag too. Might be a good idea to transfer it to the new relation?

Where was this automated edit discussed?

Is this the name of the beach/bay itself or of a business on the beach?

As the first sentence in the wiki link says they are "... used to encode ISO 3166-1 alpha-2 two-letter country codes ..." and those codes are already in OSM, this seems a redundant addition.