These don't appear to be valid international format and the phone number appears to have merged two alternate numbers into a single invalid one. Perhapse `phone=` and `alt_phone=` could be used?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134089739

You seem to have added another road over the top of one that was previously mapped. Did you mean to rename and extend the existing road?

On what basis?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133835834

Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

When creating buildings please make sure that they form a full loop without intersecting themselves.

Welcome to OpenStreetMap,

From the name I think "Bron Ltd." Should probably also have an office=company tag?

I can't remember if licenced for OSM, but this would tend to agree: https://storms.ngs.noaa.gov/storms/dorian/index.html#20/26.54342/-78.58181

Do you have a source for node/10613335740 being a lift gate? IIRC at least one of the gates is a full sized metal one that either swings or slides.

Is this a building or a concrete slab?

It doesn't seem to be casting a shadow on the MAXAR imagery.

Do you have a user report that this bridge has reopened in the last couple of weeks? It was signed as closed for repair early January.

Can the opennng_date and conditional restriction tags be removed now?

Cool. I have traced a path down to the beach, marked it as public access and tagged your original point as an information board, so that should hopefully show up as a viable route next time mobile maps are updated.

Is this path currently open?

I forgot to check onsite, but you can see from the article below that the biggest store in the building does have sprinklers.

https://ewnews.com/solomons-lucaya-holds-grand-opening-for-newly-renovated-store

Should read addr:substreet

There are quite a few bits of abandoned construction around these parts too, but they occasionally find themselves "un-abandoned" and finished when funds become available so it's a bit tricky to figure out what to keep.

Hello again.

I know in an ideal situation we remove objects from OSM once they no longer exist but please note that many of the buildings made uninhabitable by Dorian are visible as ruins on site and they are also highly visible on some of the aerial imagery. For recently damaged items would you mind leaving the ways in place and prefixing with a lifecycle prefix until such times as the "easily accessible" imagery in iD and JOSM have been updated to reflect the destruction? The database may be cleaner without them, but if they are fully removed they are likely to be re-added from out of date imagery.

For a couple of places I have private traces but elsewhere I try to roughly match whatever data is already there. Alignment does change a bit between imagery updates and unfortunately there are already cases where the roads and buildings are done to different alignment so that's not always easy to do.

A few areas do have Mapillary imagery so those traces can also be useful for a sanity check. Sorry for such a generic response. I haven't had a broad "ground based" source since Strava became difficult to use.

Did you have to edit the whole world all at once?

I think this housename might violate the policy against posting personal information.

Where was this global mechanical edit discussed?