Hugoren Martinako's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 83779609 | Well, AFAI see the the history records:
Note this last update is quite recent (Oct 1st), so amenities could have not changed yet, but they will eventually. I notice also the changeset is very large... but CajaSur Banco only were present in Andalusia region, so outer CajaSur banks should be removed. |
|
| 175206708 | Cierto, usé el editor Level0 por probar... pero no era tan simple. Gracias. |
|
| 175156492 | Revertido changeset por eliminar wikis sin sentido, y utilizar abreviaciones |
|
| 175024941 | Creado el Cañón Rojo con sus acantilados, importada la Rambla de Barrachina y mejorados los caminos circundantes |
|
| 174780648 | I see your point but I have to disagree. A highest point is definitely an important feature, but you're opening the door to include any important features inside the relations. This sort of data fits way better in wikidata statements, and imho, admin_centre is not a necessary role either, we just keep it around for convenience (like, administrative relations has a admin_centre since the start... yeah ok..). Since most mappers use iD to edit, dealing with relations gets a lot harder for them, and there’s a good chance they might mess things up, especially when we’re talking about huge relations like islands or countries. That’s why I’d rather not overcomplicate things. The simpler, the better. BR |
|
| 174780648 | Hi there, Why ru creating the role=highest_point? Where has that been discussed? I noticed you've been adding it to a multitude of relationships, usually place=island or administrative. IMO, it's something worthless (it can be obtained through overpass-turbo) and you're complicating relationships by adding unapproved roles Regards |
|
| 129534082 | Absolutely, this relation is just a set of peaks, exactly what @jpennycook mentioned: "Relations are not categories" |
|
| 167484529 | Hallo, You cannot use a wikipedia/wikidata as a source of truth, you'll need something more official, like the Ajuntament d'Eivissa website you provided (pdf version: https://www.eivissa.es/documents/34357/51577/BARRIS.pdf). Notice there are some hoods still missing. Usually the major cities have these boundaries defined by its own administration, not always though. I saw your revert changeset. If there's no official source, that's how it should be then. Thanks & Regards |
|
| 174389760 | Revertido changeset xq introduce elementos duplicados |
|
| 174436167 | Revertido changeset xq introduce elementos duplicados |
|
| 153812996 | La chorrada está más que justificada cuando no indicas de donde sacas la información, y más aún viniendo de ti precisamente. https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=18137562 Por cierto, baja el tono de prepotencia que calzas, esto es un proyecto colaborativo. |
|
| 153812996 | Hola, en la zona en construcción de la ladera, creas tres edificios:
¿Cómo sabes que son tres? ¿O por qué con esa geometría concreta? ¿Tienes algún plano de las obras? Me resulta curioso que te tomes la molestia de dibujarlos, si desconoces cómo son en realidad. No pasa nada por dejar el área en construcción, no es necesario inventar. Y si dispones de alguna fuente, enlázala en el changeset. Saludos |
|
| 173189726 | Non, fan referencia a cousas distintas, polo que debemos seguir a regra de one feature, one element osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element, sumado a que apuntan a wikidatas diferentes e os validadores non aceptan tal cousa. Ademais isto xa se discutiu hai tempo no foro: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/entidade-de-poblacion-dividida-en-mais-de-un-municipio/7072, non é un caso único. Engadirei unha clave `note=` máis aclaratoria aos nodos, que adoito poñer noutros casos similares. Saúdos |
|
| 173189726 | Non son puntos duplicados, cando teñen unha referencia INE diferente é porque pertencen a concellos ou parroquias, diferentes. Neste caso, ademais combinaches todos as etiquetas que os diferencian. |
|
| 174522251 | Revertido por contener multitud dwme errores de etiquetado |
|
| 167484529 | You're mixing concepts: in the Spain base map, you'll find residential areas, which corresponds with a way landuse=residential. That's all. Administrative boundaries, both ways and relations, with admin_level (9 or 10) tags, roles admin_centre, and so on... only can be defined by the local administration. I see you've added them both Eivissa and Santa Eulàlia... but you need the official source (SHP or similar) that defines the boundaries of the neighborhoods. Regards |
|
| 174338619 | Hola, veo que al editar la piscina: way/271714817, una serie de detalles:
Un saludo |
|
| 128440040 | Hola, hi ha carrers dins d'aquest changeset amb name:1989, que coincideix amb el name i no té un altre name diferent. Llavors, quin és la gràcia de duplicar el nom?
|
|
| 155520573 | Hi there, this node does not fulfill any requirement to be promoted as place=town. It will be restore as village. More info: osm.wiki/ES:Directrices_de_etiquetado_espa%C3%B1olas#N%C3%BAcleos_de_poblaci%C3%B3n |
|
| 167484529 | Hi there, you cannot create admin boundaries (9/10) with no official sources. In Spain, only some communities set official sub-divisions (for municipalities) and, afaik, Illes Balears do not. Therefore, none of the boudaries you created in this changeset are valid. Regards |