Please that the picnic shelter here was already mapped and that we probably do not have any Wilderness huts in Denmark

Ups. Der skulle have været henvist til note/1457392

I have reverted this, as it actually was tagged correctly

The change from historic=archaeological_site -> historic=archeological_site is a clear mistake. I'll change it back

Please do not change this. I actually did tag it correctly.

Det vil i sådanne sammenhænge oftest være en god ide at tilføje source og andre relevante oplysninger til selve de objekter du har redigeret. iD brugere og andre mindre erfarne kan ikke forventes at bemærke oplysninger der alene er angivet på et changeset.

Hvorfor er det dumt. Vaskehaller er jo sjældent helt det samme sted som benzinstanderne

Ups!

Hvor længe forventes dette at tage?

Hi. I can't see from your changeset which imagery you used here. I guess Bing though. I just wanted to notify you that the Esri world imagery (which is better quality and appears newer) shows quite a different layout of the fields around here.

Bemærk at vi foretrækker at man ikke mapper midlertidige objekter i OSM: osm.wiki/Good_practice#Don.27t_map_temporary_events_and_temporary_features.
Services i stil med https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/da/ er bedre egnet til den slags

Please not that our imported address nodes if deleted will be autiomatically recreated

See also https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/demolished%3Abuilding

Hvis motorkøretøjer ikke er tilladt, er det så ikke mere korrekt at tagge dem som gågader?

alternative navne anbringes normalt angives normalt med alt_name tagget og ikke med paranteser.

Bemærk at stednavn kun bør tilføjes navnet hvis det rent faktisk står uden på forretningen, hvilket ikke er tilfældet her.

Please note that highway=* should never connect to the edge of amenity=parking only. I just had to correct way/544139486/history

Hi. Thank you for your feedback and sorry for these and any other mistakes I may have done here.
I always take great care to check the history and source of objects I'm working with and it indeed did become apparent to me that you were mapping things that did not appear in the imagery I was working with.
Rather than delete buildings that are still visible in current imagery, I like to add the prefix "demolished:" as explained in osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix. Experienced mappers at least will notice this and not redraw such buildings. Also when road layout has changed from what is currently visible I like to explicitly state when "start_date=* " and what sources was used, so that armchair mappers like myself do have a fair chance at knowing what not to touch.

Jeg har lige tilføjet highway=residential tag til way/4313302/history igen efter at du slettede det for en måned siden.

Hi I've added buildings and some other things. Can you have a look at the site again to see if it's ok?