You deleted part of NH9?
See also my post in Indian Forum!

Sorry, but in Punjab there is no motorway!

You deleted again an NH!!!
If you go on like this, you risk that you OSM-Account will be blocked.

You deleted parts of the NH169!!!
How could this happen????

You deleted parts of the NH38; nodes were still there, but the way was deleted!!!!!!
This has now been reverted.

Why did you delete the way of this secondary road? Only the nodes are left, which I mapped years ago.

It's really without importance. I deleted all portions in India and Nepal.

This relation contains aeras, where the BING images are only with low resolution. Areas can be deleted, if there are now high resolution images.

You reverted my mapping of the 166D. I think you are wrong. The NH166D was declared on 6.2.2018. See :http://egazette.nic.in/WriteReadData/2018/182688.pdf
It is no longer SH87 but NH166D!!!

NH160 was defined here : http://egazette.nic.in/WriteReadData/2017/173465.pdf
NH166 was defined here : http://morth.nic.in/showfile.asp?lid=2924

I cann‘t see an error. But I‘m not sure around Miraj, because the definition of MORTH is not clear. It‘s possible that the NH166 takes the bypass???

I think you should use name:ne instead of name :en

name:en is not correct!!!

Thanks, I made the corrections

You created a lot of amenity=atm!!!
You are sure that's not an error???

You mapped a lot of highway=roads where there is only the border of a field.
Please delete these non existing roads.
You have been in this region and made records of GPX-tracks???
If yes, then please upload them else don't write that you used local GPX

You created a lot of tracks; but I see only the border of agricultural fields!!!!
You say that you use local GPX.
So you have been in the area and made the GPX-tracks yourself??
Please upload these tracks.
My opinion: all these tracks should be deleted!

You declare some roads as primary.
Please read the OSM-Wiki!!!
These roads are not primary.

You created a mass of duplicate nodes!!
Please try to correct this.

1) una delle ponte sul Carpesina e un path. Alhora al tuo pezzo di highway=unclassified non si puo arrivare con machine. Qui manca un pezzo di strada dal highway=service.
2) Dal mio parere un highway=unclassified deve cominciare a un highway=unclassified, tertiary.. in nessun caso comincia da un track. Mio proposito : tutti i parte su dal monte, que hai mappato, sono highway=track con tracktype=grade1 e surface=concrete (invece di asphalt)
3) non sono sicuro, ma penso que tutto la strade da Montalto fino al santuario sono highway=service (altrimenti il parking al santuario non si puo raggiungere)
4) al Madonna della Neve hai fatto anche pezzi di unclassified. Al inizio della via (SP54) adesso e un path. Vuole dire, la chiesa al monte non e aggiungibile con machina. Questo non e vero.
5) Hai fatto altri pezzi corte(lungo meno di 100m) di unclassified. Se c‘e concrete e un caso per surface; sono tracks!!
6) Vedo que lavora in questa maniera da Savona fino a la frontiera francese.
Heinz_V

Sorry I didn't correct the changeset comment, which was generated automatically by Maproulette