Hello Niels Elgaard Larsen. In your last changesets
node/5126364069
node/5127143651
node/5127145749
you have tagged some
`addr:placd` (copy'n'paste) instead of `addr:place`, right? Please review your latest editings #typo

Hello Thundercel. At node/5127099489 you have tagged `addr:phone` instead of `phone` or `contact:phone`, right? #typo

Hello johnparis. At node/5122994122 you have tagged `addr:nousename` instead of `addr:housename`, right? And sure it's the housename and not the `name` of the shop? #typo

@andy mackey: have you ever read the wiki mentioned above? so i've expected that you change it from `amenity=library` to `amenity=public_bookcase` and from old_phone_box to `public_bookcase:type=phone_box`. Or is it a really a library?

Hello claysmalley. At your blog you haven't mentioned, that you will introduce the new and so far unkown and undocumented key `frontage_road`. Is this key really necessary? #newkey

Naja, also wenn das Proposal "Approved" ist (osm.wiki/Relations/Proposed/Destination_Signs) und es auch entsprechende Wiki Seiten dazu gibt (osm.wiki/DE:Relation:destination_sign), dann würde ich da nicht mehr von "Wunsch" sprechen, und übrigens "Standard" ist bei OSM ja eh nichts ;-)
Die (komplizierte, je nachdem wieviel Übung man damit hat und welchen Editor man verwendet) Relationslösung ist halt eher dafür geeignet von Maschinen und Programmen (z.B. Routing, Ansagen im Navi, etc. ausgewertet zu werden.
Und ja, dass iD anscheined dann weiternummeriert ist durchaus in Ordnung.

nur zur Info, guck mal in die Historie #4: way/316570853/history
Wenn du sicher nichts (absichtlich und bewusst) etwas abgeändert hast, hoffe ich mal nicht, dass es sich hier um ein (neues) iD Problem handelt ;-)

`booking=https...` rather not, see https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/booking#values
I think `website=https...` is most common, or if you would like to specify it, then perhaps `website:booking` or `url:booking-com`, see https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=booking

Hello jakobine. You have tagged `vending machine` although `vending` is enough, have a look at amenity=vending_machine ;-)

Hello Polyglot. In this changeset you tagged several stop positions with `trolley_bus` (new key) instead of `trolleybus`, right?
Please have a look at https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/trolleybus`

Hello Ótica Brilho no Olhar. At node/5124927950 you have used `telefone` instead of `phone`, right? phone=*

Hello maxphizik. At way/383295371 you have used the new (and so far unkown and undocumented) key `sentinel`. What is it for? #newkey

btw `old-phone-box` would be a new (and so far unkown) key.

Hello andy mackey. Do you searched for amenity=public_bookcase ? ;-)

Hello DaveF. At way/527133418 (and following) you have tagged `notre` instead of `note`, right? #typo

Hello murble. At node/5124680688 you have used the new (and misspelled) key `localtion_ref` instead of the more common `ref:location`, right? #typo

Hallo projecter63. Bei way/152283400 hast du `herheritage:operator` anstelle von `heritage:operator` getaggt, oder? #typo

Hallo Buntbart. Bei hast du `healthcare-speciality` anstelle von `healthcare:speciality` getaggt, oder? Siehe auch https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/healthcare%3Aspeciality

new key `foor` (instead of `foot`?) at
way/527121626
way/527121624

@SK53: i've just commented it for public, which can correct it, if they want. I have no local knowledge, so i won't correct it ;-)

Hello Puppe Paistok. At way/527055977 you have tagged `duckboars` instead of `duckboards`, right? #typo