Hello ChrSchultz. At node/5119916348 you have tagged `bikes=yes`. Should it be `bicycle=yes` instead? Please have a look at amenity=charging_station#Vehicles ;-) #typo

Hello arcanma. Arround the Piazza della Repubblica you have tagged `bicicle=yes` instead of `bicycle=yes`, right? #typo

Sorry, this should not be a reproach of "tag for the render". And certainly, anyone can add new keys, but it should have a benefit, not?

Hello PC10. Within this changeset, you have introduced some new (and so far unkown and undocumented) keys: `aream2` (could be automatically calculated by the way/area itself), `namead`, `proyecto`, `valued`. What are all the keys for? Also i think this look like a little bit of an import, right?

Hello osm ebenezer. What is way/526500550 for? I can't see any osm relevant information there. Is this an imported shape(file)?

Hello kwaku_boateng. What is way/52649387 for? I can't see any osm relevant information there. Is this an imported shape(file)?

Hello metr250. At way/26932284 you have tagged `addr:contry` instead of `addr:country`, right? #typo

Hello Teemu Piippo. At way/317656241 i think you missed some `e` at `accss`, right? ;-) #typo

Good question. Other question: right now, what's the benefit of your mappings with all the new keys, if they aren't documented and/or discussed, so that other mappers and then also renderers or apps would use it, too?

Hello blendergeek. At way/40398389 you have tagged `maxpeed:advisory` instead of `maxspeed:advisory`, right? #typo

wenn ich eines bei osm gelernt habe, dann dass es nichts "eindeutiges" gibt. im gegensatz zu anderen maße ich mir aber eben nicht an in fremden gebieten ohne ortskenntnis solche auf dem ersten blick lapidare fehler zu beheben. da könnten ja eventuell auch noch andere fehler vorliegen, z.B. logische, usw.
PS: ich habe es früher mal gemacht, aber nachdem ich die quittung dafür in keepright, osmose, osminspector und co bekommen habe, weil ich der "letzte" bearbeiter war, lasse ich das einfach ;-)

Hello Andrey Yusov. At way/525336753 you have tagged `fuel:methan`. Did you mean `fuel:methanol` instead? https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=methan

Hello samuelrussell. At node/5110232349 you have used `amenity=toilet;drinking_water`. I think you should remove `drinking_water` and use it as key: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/drinking_water
And please `amenity=toilets` (with s) ;-)
Also `ambulant` is a new (and so far unkown and undocumented) key. What is it for?

Hello AdVerburg. At node/5111469658 you have tagged `340=200`. What is it for? Some mistake? #newkey

Hello Aditya joshi. At way/504766969 you have used the so far unused combination `amenity=complex` and introduced a new key `jagadamba complex`. What is it for? What do you want to achieve with this tagging? #newkey

Hello Nini Johanna Secue. At the relation you have added `highway-path=Camino`. Did you mean the `name` instead? #newkey #typo

Hello Kleper. At all the relations you have added `highway-path=Camino`. Did you mean the `name` instead? #newkey #typo

Hello Jay May. At way/411066590 you have tagged `hg` instead of `hgv`, right? #typo

Hello m3ph. At node/5113539391 you have tagged `health_specialty:acupuncture_1`. Why the `_1`? #newkey #typo

Hello m3ph. At way/91401337 i think something is wrong with `health_facility:type=health_centre=yes` ;-) Please have a look again. #newkey #typo