Ooops, that was a mistake. Sorry. JOSM managed to remember the description from a previous changeset and I managed to commit it with that instead of one describing that I'd added PV installations.

At the time my access to imagery was limited. I've now moved it to a separate way.

The JOSM reverter doesn't seem to be working at the moment, so I've used Frederick Ramm's perl reverter script to perform the revert. A few relations seem to have been edited since (presumably the coastline). I've taken a cursory glance through the boundaries and route relations and they seem to be OK, but I'll try to sanity check the data in more depth after work tonight.

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/37014168 where the changeset comment is: Revert deletions made in changeset/36985172 in the Kingsdown area

I think I had marked the relevant squares as closed. I was just adding a note that there were some roads visible in the Bing imagery in adjacent "squares" that could also be added.

I hadn't seen that mailing list post. I'll stop using the Land Registry Price Paid data until it becomes clear that it can be used again. Luckily you'll find that I've tagged all of my direct uses with source:addr:postcode=land_registry_price_paid_data and all of the ones that I've interpolated from existing "knowns" with source:addr:postcode=interpolation.