OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
171998079

Hi, it looks like you added and invalid layer tag here. Pleas read layer=* to better understand its use.

173675583

Hi, it looks like you added an invalid layer tag here. Please read layer=* to better understand its use.

173585383

Hi, I appreciate you improving the geometry of a few of the buildings here, but the middle footprint appears to envelope multiple buildings, the rightmost feature looks to be a field, the layer tag was not removed from the smallest building, and the NW footprint includes part of the building to the north and it has not been positioned at the base of the building (which is easier to spot when cross referencing another source like Bing). The layer tags aren't immediately obvious, perhaps you use it already, but the layer chacker paint style helps with spotting them. Hope this helps.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173585383

173704166

Hi, thanks for moving the footprint you added to try and place it at the base of the building though it should have been moved slightly further north and east to achieve this. You correctly recognised and deleted roof furniture, but the building footprint you added is too small; it should extend further south. This is clearer when cross refernecing another source such as Bing. Hope this helps.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173704166

173704166

Hi, thanks for moving the footprint you added to try and place it at the base of the building though it should have been moved slightly further north and east to achieve this. You correctly recognised and deleted roof furniture, but the building footprint you added is too small; it should extend further south. This is clearer when cross refernecing another source such as Bing. Hope this helps.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173704166

173579355

Hi, it looks like you applied an invalid layer tag here. Please read layer=* to better understand its use.

173667408

Hi, it looks like you applied an invalid layer tag here. Please read layer=* to better understand its use.

173691730

Hi, it looks like you applied an invalid layer tag here. Please read layer=* to better understand its use.

173602916

Hi, it looks like you applied an invalid layer tag here. Please read layer=* to better understand its use.

173720467

Hi, it looks like you applied an invalid layer tag here. Please read layer=* to better understand its use.

173563756

Hi, it looks like you applied an invalid layer tag here. Please read layer=* to better understand its use.

173765585

Hi, it looks like you applied an invalid layer tag to resolve data overlaps here. Please read layer=* to better understand the use of this tag.

173667887

Hi, it looks like you added an invalid layer tag here. Please read layer=* to better understand the tag.

171711623

hi, it looks like you added an invlaid layer tag here please read layer=* to better understand this tag.

173610105

Hi, it looks like you inappropriately added a layer tag here. Please read layer=* to better understand its use.

172510100

Please see layer=* to understand the use of the layer tag.

173679014

Hi, it looks like you identified buildings in imagery, but didn't map them as accuratlely as the imagery allows. Just so you know it is unnecessary to add an area tag to building footprints as that is assumed to be the case. Layer tags are mostcommonly found on building=roof areas like those found at fuel stations and landuse=residential is used to define areas used for residential purposes, not individual buildings. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173679014

100118497

Hi daganzdaanda,

I think you are correct. Likely I sent this to you by accident. I addressed and sent a message to the contributor who added the tags.

Thanks for your response!

162002452

I did not intend to address the last comment to you.

43424535

Hello,

Why did you tag the highways in this area the way you did? e.g. in way/402672543 you changed your own tagging between versions 6 & 10.