OpenStreetMap
Gregory Peony's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 168064601 | Hi. It looks like you aligned highways to imagery well and correctly identified steps in the imagery on some occasions. The feature I flagged looks like it has sections of steps and some flat/ramp sections.
|
|
| 169300765 | Regarding your comment about deletion; it probably was possible to seperate the features which shared nodes by disconnecting them. You did well to try to preserve the tags and inform me of the deletion. I have restored the history of the school buildings and pitches deleted in this changeset. Check here https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/258922387
|
|
| 168852935 | Why did you tag the ways flagged as highway= corridor and indoor=yes. I can see a car on that highway in the imagery. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 169067336 | You're welcome; thank you for responding! |
|
| 168422144 | Some of the footprints you added here are okay, but there are many others where it appears that you mapped them inaccurately becasue existing data was in the way. You should modify the existing data if it is inaccurate to allow allow for accurate mapping. You can use the w or alt+w shortcuts to toggle map data and get a better view of the underlying imagery to make more informed decisions regarding existing data. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 169301425 | Generally it looks to me like you're identifying buildings in imagery and taking care to map the features you add accurately, and you're modifying features instead of deleting and re mapping them. Thank you very much for that. The footprint I flagged likely does not represent a building but rather a part of the roof of the building to its East. Consider that you are looking from above at the roofs of buildings but trying to map the footprint (which is at ground level). The footprint doesn't necessarily completely match the shape of roofs try to map what is the most likely footprint shape e.g. there could be some parts of the roof missing, or they might overhang the footprint. Sometimes the roof is corroded making it appear as a different building. I hope this helps.
|
|
| 168093629 | Hi, you generally identified buildings in imagery. The footprints I flagged envelope multiple buildings. Take care to map one footprint per building. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 168239611 | Hi, consider that you are looking from above but mapping building footprints. I flagged a few features where it looks like you mapped sections of roof which likely belong to one building. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 168617056 | You're tagging these as houses; have you surveyed them? If so, I'd be great if you could include the source "survey" in your changeset tags.
|
|
| 168616422 | Consider that you are looking from above when viewing aerial imagery, but mapping building footprints. The roof shape is not necessarily the same as the footprint. It's generally accurate to map footprints slightly smapper than the roof; this also prevents data issues like overlaps etc. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 168616725 | Highways and buildings should not share nodes. Hold alt to prevent the creation of shared nodes. I recommend that you watch the new mapper mistakes videos on this page https://www.youtube.com/@TheMissingMaps or perhaps a HOT ID editor training webinar. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 168617434 | You incorrectly modified the geometry of a waterway to avoid an overlap issue. Map the geometry of highways and waterways accurately and resolve overlaps using fords,bridges and culverts when you know what's there. If you're not confident then just leave it; it's better than hiding the error which makes it more difficult for others to find and fix. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 168268240 | Take care when contributing map data to make it easier for others to add to your contribuitons rather than having to modify them or remap them. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 168071503 | Hi, it's unnecessary to map the footprint of power towers. Check osm.wiki/Map_features if you come across features you're not familiar with. I deleted this. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 168196708 | Hi, you identified buildings in the imagery. Just keep in mind that you're looking at the roofs of buildings but mapping their footprint so mapping slightly smaller than the roof is considered accurate. You can scale feautes in ID with shift(-/+). Thanks for your contributions.
|
|
| 169093169 | Hi, you deleted a place point which contained the name of a settlement. Consider what it is appropriate for you to modify and delete based on the information sources available to you. For example it is possible to see with aerial imagery alone that the shape of features like residential areas has changed or that a settlement is likely either a hamlet or a village. For names however you'd either have to conduct a survey, or reference another source where the name is documented. If a place point's current place value disagrees with your evaluation of a settlement then please update that value rather than deleting the whole thing. Resolved in https://osmcha.org/changesets/169220513 ---Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 169093126 | Resolved in https://osmcha.org/changesets/169220411
|
|
| 169092865 | Hi, you deleted a place point which contained the name of a settlement. Consider what it is appropriate for you to modify and delete based on the information sources available to you. For example it is possible to see with aerial imagery alone that the shape of features like residential areas has changed or that buildings no longer exist. For names however you'd either have to conduct a survey, or reference another source where the name is documented. Resolved in https://osmcha.org/changesets/169220231 --- Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 169092676 | Hi Annie, You updated the geometry of the residential area and correctly modified the tags of the place point. The residential area should have also included the buildings to the NE and E.
|
|
| 169091773 | The residential area here should have been modified to include buildings to the West. Place points should be either placed centrally within a settlement to make it obvious which settlements they represent.
|