OpenStreetMap
Gregory Peony's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 168616422 | Consider that you are looking from above when viewing aerial imagery, but mapping building footprints. The roof shape is not necessarily the same as the footprint. It's generally accurate to map footprints slightly smapper than the roof; this also prevents data issues like overlaps etc. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 168616725 | Highways and buildings should not share nodes. Hold alt to prevent the creation of shared nodes. I recommend that you watch the new mapper mistakes videos on this page https://www.youtube.com/@TheMissingMaps or perhaps a HOT ID editor training webinar. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 168617434 | You incorrectly modified the geometry of a waterway to avoid an overlap issue. Map the geometry of highways and waterways accurately and resolve overlaps using fords,bridges and culverts when you know what's there. If you're not confident then just leave it; it's better than hiding the error which makes it more difficult for others to find and fix. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 168268240 | Take care when contributing map data to make it easier for others to add to your contribuitons rather than having to modify them or remap them. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 168071503 | Hi, it's unnecessary to map the footprint of power towers. Check osm.wiki/Map_features if you come across features you're not familiar with. I deleted this. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 168196708 | Hi, you identified buildings in the imagery. Just keep in mind that you're looking at the roofs of buildings but mapping their footprint so mapping slightly smaller than the roof is considered accurate. You can scale feautes in ID with shift(-/+). Thanks for your contributions.
|
|
| 169093169 | Hi, you deleted a place point which contained the name of a settlement. Consider what it is appropriate for you to modify and delete based on the information sources available to you. For example it is possible to see with aerial imagery alone that the shape of features like residential areas has changed or that a settlement is likely either a hamlet or a village. For names however you'd either have to conduct a survey, or reference another source where the name is documented. If a place point's current place value disagrees with your evaluation of a settlement then please update that value rather than deleting the whole thing. Resolved in https://osmcha.org/changesets/169220513 ---Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 169093126 | Resolved in https://osmcha.org/changesets/169220411
|
|
| 169092865 | Hi, you deleted a place point which contained the name of a settlement. Consider what it is appropriate for you to modify and delete based on the information sources available to you. For example it is possible to see with aerial imagery alone that the shape of features like residential areas has changed or that buildings no longer exist. For names however you'd either have to conduct a survey, or reference another source where the name is documented. Resolved in https://osmcha.org/changesets/169220231 --- Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 169092676 | Hi Annie, You updated the geometry of the residential area and correctly modified the tags of the place point. The residential area should have also included the buildings to the NE and E.
|
|
| 169091773 | The residential area here should have been modified to include buildings to the West. Place points should be either placed centrally within a settlement to make it obvious which settlements they represent.
|
|
| 169093591 | Hi, you outlined buildings with residential areas here but they are neither valid nor accurate. Landuse areas hould not overlap or be duplicated. The guidelines recommened for place point tagging are minimums i.e. there need to be at least X buildings within close proximity for them to be considered a settlement. Think about place names and ask yourself when is it likely that a village or hamlet would have a seperate name. --- Look around the area with ESRI imagery to see how I mapped it. Resolved: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169213955 ---Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 169091843 | You correctly updated the residential area (though it could be slightly more accurate), and correctly modifed the tags of the existing place point. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 169092087 | Quite an accurate residential area and accurate place node. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 169092164 | Good judgement on not extending the Northern residential area across the highway/waterway just to add two buildings to it. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 169092072 | Hi, it looks like you mapped this inline with project instructions. Good job with your residential area accuracy; buildings don't appera to have been left out or overlapped.
|
|
| 169092896 | Individual plots like this do not warrant place points.
|
|
| 169092636 | Hi, you deleted an existing place node that represented the settlement in the South. The reason for critical severity is that information about this place like its name were likely sourced via survey meaning that the information must be reaquired and added to the new place node you added if the deletion were not noticed. The value of the place tag of the existing place node should have been modified to village. Don't fret I un did the deletion of the old place node. In future consider if it is appropriate to delete of modify existing data. Resolution https://osmcha.org/changesets/169207856 ---Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 169092969 | Hi Isis, this residential area should include the buildings just to the south . Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 169092662 | Hi ChienC, you mapped valid settlements here but the residential areas could have been more accurately mapped. If you choose to map with two distinct residential areas then you don't need to include the space between these settlements becasue it appears to be mainly road/driven on.
|