OpenStreetMap
Gregory Peony's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 167200860 | You correctly identified buildings in the imagery however they are generally oversized. This led to overlapping footpritns in the SE; these overlapps stem from poor geometry and should not be resloved by using layer tags, becasue that hides the problem. Accurate building size is also important for accurate population estimates. You can use the shortcut shft+(-/+) to scale selected features after you shape them. --- Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 167200980 | All footpritns valid please remember to square or circularise them with q or o respectively. I resolved this in Changeset: 167223453. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Don't let the bad review discourage you. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 167201003 | I flagged footpritns which would either be more accurately mapped as square or should not be mapped as building footprins. Hope this helps.
|
|
| 167201073 | All footprints represent buildings visible in imagery and the vast majority are quite accurate. I think the two that I flagged are actually square. well mapped overall --- Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 166429007 | The footprint I flagged erreoneously shares a common node with another. Hold alt to prevent your cursor from snapping to map data. Please watch the beginer mistakes videos on the missing maps youtube channel for a demo of this.
|
|
| 166835338 | The footprint I flagged outlines 2 buildings.
|
|
| 166805008 | Thanks for trying to accurately map the shape of features. Check to see if a simpler shape is a good fit for the shape of features before trying more complex ones. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 166864269 | You identified buildings visible in the imagery and appropriately shaped them but they are generally too large. Take more care when placing the nodes and/or use the shift+(-/+) shortcut to scale features after tagging and shaping them. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 167157659 | I think that the vast majortiy of footprnits added here do not likely represent buildings.
|
|
| 166864003 | all footprints valid and appropriately shaped but could be more accurate in size.
|
|
| 167154593 | All footprints valid and accurate. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 166986253 | Valid deletion of significantly oversized building footprins and mapping more accurate ones. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 166986336 | A valid deletion of a significantly oversized footprint. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 166750406 | Same as the other water point comment. I flagged the water point. Why did you delete these nodes? Don't worry I added the POIs back to OSM in Changeset: 167117187. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 166676210 | Hi please do not delete POIs like the water point mapped here. I do not think that the imagery provides sufficient evidence for its deletion and it was originally stated to have been added after a survey. It is a feature beyond the scope of the project and does not appear to interfere with building footprints.--- I undeleted this feature in Changeset: 167116981 Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 166485572 | You correctly identified buildings from the imagery. I think the footprint I flagged does not represent a building.--- Some of the footprints were not sized as accurately as they could have been; accurate sizing leades to better population estimates. Take care to not include shadows in the building footprnt. The footprint can be a little smaller than the roof. Use ctrl + alt and your cursor to resize features in JOSM.--- Please map the smaller square features which also cast prominent shadows. A good rule of thumb is that you should add features 2 m^2<; using the measrement tool and selecting a feature will show you its area.--- Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 166450327 | Good job spotting the Western most building here I think that one is more difficult to identify.--- You did well mapping in the overcast area to the North: you can increase the imagery's brightness via the background pane (b) of the iD editor which can help map in areas like this. Sometimes the footprints you're mapping are ever so slightly oversized.--- Pitched roofs tend to overhang the walls of a building somewhat, so the footprint can be mapped slightly smaller than the roof for buildings with roofs like these. --- Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 166162018 | These buildings likely have round footprints. Buildings with thatch roofs can look somewhat irregular but the footprint underneath is likely either round or square. Roofs can overhang the walls of the building. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 166142849 | All building footprints here are valid, accurate and appropriately shaped. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
|
|
| 166409560 | Overall these footprints look to have been improved in accuracy. Some footprints used to envelope multiple buildings and now outline individual footprints. --- I think that one of the footprints I flagged envelopes multiple buildings and the other should be suared becasue it looks like it is distorted in the imagery. Buildings that are not round or have irregular angles tend to be located on junctions or are in densley built areas where that shape maximises the use of available space.
|