Every footprint here is valid and accurate (including the round one). Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164177641

Overall a good contribution, but highways and buildings should not share nodes and the round building actually has square corners. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164177218

The round buildings you added here actually have square corners: generally buildings with (blue) metal roofs have square footprints. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164175162

All footprints valid, accurate and appropriately squared. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164176617

The footpritnt I flagged here outlines multiple buildings.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159483327

I flagged some footprints which outline multiple buildings here.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164091642

The Eastern footprint is valid and looks appropriately shaped, the orientation could be a little more accurate: zooming out gives better orientation information. The western footpritnt may actually represent a barrier like a fence or wall given that it casts shadows around its entire perimiter and nothing else is close enough to it to cast those shadows in its stead. Thanks for mapping.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164925482

All footprints are valid, and all but one have been appropriately squared. They would be more accurate if they were smaller; pitched roofs tend to overhang walls, so draw at or within the edges of the roof. See how I mapped theses buildings in Changeset: 164947758.--- You appropriately modified the residential area to prevent it overlapping with footprints.--- Rather than deleting and redrawing features use the replace geometry tool (ctrl.+shift+G), or the conflation plugin to modify features while preserving their meta data and history.--- Thank you for mapping.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164939416

This footprint envelopes multiple buildings. Footpritns should represent individual buildigs. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159717682

All footprints here are valid. The two in the north are quite accurate the two in the south could be more accurate. Check Changeset: 164917634 to see how I mapped these footprints and others nearby.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164178570

Check Changeset: 164916878 to see how I mapped one of these instead.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159483145

All these footprints are valid, but oversized and should be squared (q).
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159482709

The footprints you added here envelope multiple buildings. A footprint should represent an individual building. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159483145

The footprints you added are all valid and appropriately squared but generally oversized, sometimes becasue they include the shadow in the footprint. Pitched roofs tend to overhang the walls so is more accurate to map them a touch smaller than the roof. If features are very close together this can lead to the not being enough room to fit them all. See how I mapped these in Changeset: 164916703.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164174782

Many of the footprints here are overextracted i.e. they don't represent buildings or they are features which will not be there for long.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160210117

I think that many of these footprints are invalid and you may have mistaken other features for buildings.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160198618

These residential areas are not valid; there aren't enough buildings in close proximity and this is an agricultural area. This also means the the tagging of residential highways is incorrect. In an agricultural area such as this they are likely tracks or paths, and maybe unclassified. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164810838

Overall a good contribution. All footpritns are valid, and appropriately shaped, but could be more accurate. --- Footpritns should not share nodes with residential areas; the common beginer mapper mistakes videos on the missing maps youtube chanel will show you how to deal with that. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164093530

All footprints here outline an individual building in the imagery except for the one in the West. The footprints however are not accurate and share common nodes. I recommend watching the common mapper mistakes videos on the missing maps youtube chanel.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164091943

The buildings here are valid and appropriately squared they are quite accurate, but include a portion of the shadow they cast. Pitched roofs usually overhang the walls of buildings by some ammount so 'colouring within the lines' leads to more accurate sizing. --- appropriate modification of a residential area. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164799579