Hi there - please don't use 'highway=trunk' - that should only be used for the SINGLE most important highway in an area!

I have already deleted them - no need to.

Hello - Please stop creating fake routes and objects. Your mapping assistance is greatly appreciated in Mali, but what you're doing is considered map vandalism, and is NOT helpful at all. Thanks

@Narayana Sadasivam You cannot just insert fantasy points-of-interest (POI's) into tasks you are working. These are REAL Places! M'Pegoumba does not have a bus stop, or playground, or an open market. Your changes will need to be reverted, not only on this project, but on all projects you are inserting non-existent POI's into.
Please stop doing this - this is NOT helpful!

Hello - merci pour la cartographie! Essayez de relier vos routes ensemble - si vous cartographiez une route non connectée, elle est inutilisable pour le routage

Ohhh! Vous avez nommé le village << Panneaux Kanabougou >> au lieu d'ajouter un panneau!
Je l'ai corrigé! :)

Bonjour - Le petit village au sud de Kanabougou s'appelle-t-il "Panneaux Kanabougou"?
Ou étiez-vous en train de marquer un magasin de panneaux solaires?

It's dependent on the country, actually.
For Canada, large municipalities use admin=6, lower-tier/rural municipalities use admin=8.
boundary=administrative#10_admin_level_values_for_specific_countries
But regardless, BOTH levels are for incorporated municipalities, the act of incorporation is what generates a border, and that's the case for all admin boundaries. Admin boundaries are LEGAL political and/or administrative boundaries - you can't just make up a boundary that you feel defines a place and label it boundary=administrative if there's no such boundary in existence!
Okay, I've said my piece. I'll leave it at that. I just wanted you to know all this before someone from the Working Group finds out what you're doing.
If you're marking any more boundaries based on administrative data from an authoritative source, you need to cite that source going forward!

Greetings - Why did you mark the industrial zone here as an administrative boundary? Milne Inlet is not an incorporated town, and so does not actually have such a boundary.
The same goes for Mary River at the mine mouth.
Are you doing this to replace landuse areas marked as villages and towns? Less tolerant mappers would probably revert this, fyi.

Was this an import? You plopped down 2000 untagged nodes in this changeset - following highways that you had edited, and then 2 thousand more untagged nodes on top of those in changeset/91233339.
A JOSM hiccup maybe? I'm deleting some and trying to reuse most of them - but still a lot there!

No motorways here!
Pas d'autoroutes ici!

Hey Daniel - Just so you know, you want to tag highway construction as
highway=construction
construction=<highway class>
What you've mapped won't render as U/C for most data consumers! :)
Really happy you know how to map arterials! Too many in HOT don't! Cheers...

Looks like we were editing the same area...

I don't intend to mislead you - so I'll confess that I am NOT local to Mali. I'm armchair mapping from the US.

It's okay! We're obviously on the same page mentally. Love the work you've done on Bamako - it certainly has needed it.
I've been placing settlement names throughout Kati and Koulikoro cercles, but I don't have good data for Bamako city, so I'm largely leaving it alone.

Salut!
re: node/1051051796 node/1051051796
This is a crash SITE from 1983 - if there is a memorial there, fine - but I'm not on the ground to confirm that. But I think the "ruins" can be removed without a ground survey. Would you agree?

Salut! Please do not create place names with all CAPITAL LETTERS. First letter of each word capitalized - that is all.
DIALAYA -> non
Dialaya -> oui
Merçi!

And another note - to everyone here. I've found boundaries in Mali imported from maplibrary.org that are absolute junk.
I've come to the assumption that anything imported from that source is automatically suspect (at best), automatically false at worst.

@Richū I have seen some very talented and knowledgeable mappers kicked out of OSM because of attitudes like yours. Please understand that OSM is a "best effort" project - if an edit isn't perfect, you try to improve on the effort, not automatically delete or revert.
Everyone in this thread has the same goal - to get it right. But in the OSM world, that goal is a way, not just a node.
(Nice metaphor, eh?)

Sorry, to be clear - I meant deleting the buildings that are not in the more current imagery. The next project for the area will be a building mapping project for beginners.