I wrote a complaint at the Austrian OSM mailing list about your revert philosophy and about your unacceptable way to discuss things.

By simplifying my edits to the terminus "deletions", your accusations sound like vandalism, but they were not.

Sorry, not map note, to the tag "note".

Today I modified the tag tourism to unused:tourism.

A year ago I moved some tag information to a map note, because they were (in partial consensus with the creators) misleading or obviously wrong.

And please try to avoid phrases like "how dare you". That is really offending. And of course I dare to edit the map. This is a community project. Users are warmly welcome to edit!

I did not delete any tags.

It is not common sense to discuss every single edit with the previous users, if the intention is to improve the data.

The current situation is misleading.

You just reverted my edit without any discussion, without the intention of improving the situation. That is offensive!

This revert was carried out without any discussion!

I find the current situation misleading. See the discussion at the Austrian OSM mailing list.

Please don't name my edits vandalism. Please do not revert my edits without discussion.

I

Whatever it is, it's at least "disused", right?

I don't know, if the creators "showed off", but they published their site at OSM and opened a discussion about it. They didn't mention artwork, right?

I tried to improve the situation by adding the tag "disused". According to fkv's photos, I would say, "abondoned" would be an even better way to describe the situation there.

Your accusations are ridiculous and provoking. As far as I know the creators did not state themselves as artists and thy did not introduce the site as piece of artwork.

To my opinion, the tag tourism=artwork artwork should be removed. I can't see any kind of artwork on the provided photos and - as far as I can remember - it was not the intention of the creators of this place to build some kind of artwork.

The name of the object can not be independently verified. Nothing "on the ground" gives reason for the naming.

Hallo User FF_Kobenz,
ich wurde von einem Kollegen auf Deine Edits aufmerksam gemacht.

Vorerst: Schoen, dass Du zur OpenStreetmap-Karte beitragen moechtest.

Leider verwendest Du bei Deinen Edits sehr oft das name Tag auf falsche Art und Weise. Ich bitte Dich ueber grundsaetzliche Regeln bei OSM zu informieren. Ein paar Links dazu befinden sich z.B. auf meiner Profil-Seite.

Solltest Du mit den Edits auf diese Art und Weise fortfahren, ist leider eine temporaere Sperre und eine vollstaendige Revertierung Deiner Arbeit nicht auszuschliessen. Es waere Schade um Deine Beitraege!

Beste Gruesse, Gppes

Hi, ich habe bei dem Modellflugplatz ein paar Aenderungen vorgenommen entsprechend: osm.wiki/Proposed_features/Model_Aerodrome

Unklar ist mir der Viewpoint, der dort eingezeichnet ist. Ist dort wirklich ein Aussichtspunkt? Ist der oeffentlich zugaenglich? Ist er unter diesem Namen "bekannt"?

Hi, josm raunzt beim "Kaltbach" (way/379441201), dass es sich hier um ein auffaellig lange untertunneltes Bacherl handelt (layer = -1). Ist der wirklich unterirdisch, oder ist hier ein kleines Missgeschick passiert? Lg, Gppes

Vorne am Haus fehlt das Ordinationsschild. Ich bin hier immer noch unsicher...

Danke fuer den Link! Oje, dann werde ich das ausbessern. Lg, Gppes