GoodClover's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 90000000 | Woop! β§\(>o<)οΎβ§
|
|
| 89763331 | Oh, sorry, I missed the fact this was with StreetComplete.
|
|
| 89763331 | Whilst this changeset is good, you have been to the location and surveyed the post-boxes! :)
Have fun mapping!! :)
|
|
| 89819941 | I'm sure this was accidental, as the iD editor likes to do this, but one of the buildings has been turned into a multipolygon for no reason, with a normal version also existing as a dupliate.
|
|
| 89900188 | May I ask why you added a (I think duplicate) serivce road and then delete the old one in changeset: changeset/89900082 If you made a mistake and added a duplicate please delete the new way and not the old way, this way the editing history is preserved. Thanks o/ |
|
| 89470361 | Heyo! Hope you're doing well :)
Have fun :)
|
|
| 89531915 | Ah sorry I was wrong, you used MAPS.ME to edit, I do not know how to align images in that program, so please look that up yourself! |
|
| 89531915 | Welcome to OSM!
Any more questions feel free to ask me!
|
|
| 89538783 | Hello and Welcome to OSM!
|
|
| 89497828 | Sorry, this edit is perfectly fine, my mistake :)
|
|
| 89479142 | Ah good, that's fine then, was just checking π |
|
| 88472355 | For some reason this edit has moved a bus stop in Louth as well as the buildings you mentioned.
|
|
| 89194504 | Bing imagery is the best in and near Hull in my experience.
|
|
| 89479142 | Was this an automated edit?
If it was just the brand tags then personally I think it is ok. |
|
| 89497828 | What is the lone node to the south of this edit for?
|
|
| 100 | I know someone else is gonna come here out of curiosity like me. |
|
| 1 | obligatory comment to get my name here |
|
| 88240571 | Source shouldn't have had notes as one of the sources and should have had Aerial Imagery |
|
| 87960457 | How exactly does this footpath cross Peony grove?
Thanks for contributing to OSM! |
|
| 87880592 | Welcome to OSM!
This edit looked suspicious because of it's large bounding box, but that is just because of the size of the relation you edited. If it was just the Wikipedia article you changed then that's fine :) |