If you go to the counties imap parcels, zoom into the area, then on the left hand side open the layer and select show addresses. While they don't have buildings, they do have addresses where buildings are located.

Nice addition. I added sidewalks and addresses using the counties parcel data. I suspect there is a crossing at the start of 34th street but can you confirm?

It was the DAV Construction LLC node.

Thanks for asking. When you save and upload an edit follow the guidance at osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments.

Basically, just leave a brief description of what you did.

Instead of deleting the building, just change the tags to the correct tags. In this case building=roof + layer=1. I went ahead and added it back.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178841676

It looks like you added the same device twice. Can you review this edit to make sure the devices are accurate.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178839305

Please add a changeset comment when uploading. This may help you and others in the future.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178834607

The bot made the node look like a regular business, but it just looks like a private house. I doubt they would want people showing up 24 hours a day, but that is what may happen. I would have deleted this node.

Why did you add access=private? It should be posted as no trespassing. If it is privately maintain then ownership=private would be more approriate.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178792034

This device seems to be no where near a road. Can you confirm it is in the correction location?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178772182

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. You could also add the name of the business + any other info like website and phone number along with a tag to describe the type of business. I'll send you more info on OSM in a message. There you can find links to our wiki to help you.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178699871

#TIP: We don't use descriptive names, instead just make sure the tags are correct. Looks like someone removed the name tags.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178642700

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178609947

We don't use descriptive names unless they are posted on the field. Can you verify that there are signs with the fields name?

Also, please use a brief descriptive changeset comment. Like "Added farms and a pond.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178601374

It helps to add crossing=unmarked to warn drivers of the type of crossing.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178552516

Yes, they do count. Unfortunately, the imagery hasn't caught up yet.

I noticed the added exit way from Hwy 20 to North Skagit Street. We typically don't add a turn way unless there is a physical barrier. I just just there this week and I don't recall a barrier but I know they did construction at this intersection. also if there is a barrier, it should be tagged as a primary link.

From all of the gates and barriers, and from talking to a former skagit county manager I don't think so, but I've email the only employee with the county to hopefully get a definative answer.

#TIP: we don't use descriptive names in OSM, the tags do all the work. I went ahead and removed the name tag.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178383795

I know this was a couple of years back, but do you know why you added bicycle=permissive to a couple of short ways infront of the train/bus station bldg? I'm trying to create a bike map and they don't connect to anything.