Question, is SE 12th Street have no trespassing signs or is it just privately owned? If privately owned then use ownership=private. Also, King County iMap appears shows this a owned by the city of North Bend
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169962677

I have reverted the border change. Thanks for getting back to me.

I went ahead and added sport-multi. The area looks like a half court basketball, but I'm not sure about the other markings. If you find out, the correct tagging would be something like sport=basketball;tennis;etc. Just add the games separated by a semicolon.

#TIP: use the tag ownership=private instead of access=private unless the road is marked as no trespassing.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169841695

What kind of sport or sports are played on here? Can you add them?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169839110

#TIP: Instead of deleting and then adding the feature back, just adjust the geometry and tags to save the history of a feature
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169835919

DWG here. I was about to revert the previous changeset that moved the border. While I know of the conflict, I'm not knowledgeable of the details. Is this an actual disputed area or should it be reverted back to the previous state?

Looks like you added a waterway=drain to the building. Fortunately someone else removed it.

Also, when adding trees, sometimes it is easier to draw a polygon around a group of trees and tag it as natural=wood.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169698561

#TIP: when a drive through goes under a roof, I usually separate the roof section from the building, then add layer=1 to the building=roof.

The rest of your edits looks great.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169689339

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169675965

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169745915

Do you know if this region is still under dispute between Chile and Argentina? DWG received a report that it has been resolved but with no documentation that it has.

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169536701

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169536636

#TIP: square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q" - they will look very professionally done
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169533047

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169485230

#TIP: Descriptive names are not used in OSM. Instead, just tagging the feature is sufficient.

Also, from the aerial imagery, this looks like a highway=footpath instead of a path. A path is more like a trail.

Can you review this edit?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169474612

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169484707

Do you know if OSM is allowed to use Ferndale's imagery? I'm in Skagit county and know that the imagery can not be used in OSM.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169427509

This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169422235