Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166323340

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166322986

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.

I would recommend merging the shop node with the building outline since they seem to be business run in the building. The rest of your edits look good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166325402

While a cliff can be tag with a node, they are more often tag as a way. See natural=cliff for more information on natural=cliff.

Also, instead of adding the tag hashtags=#cwugeog to the feature, just start your changeset comment with #cwugeog plus the brief description of your edit.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166232316

As pwbriggs said, thanks for correcting the street name. Could you also rename the bridge over the creek also? The county's imap isn't very specific as to where the name changes to 132nd Avenue Southeast. Can you verify where it changes?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166176219

We don't use descriptive names in OSM. Just tag it as building=house is sufficient. Can you remove the names from the houses?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166222836

The concrete way around the parking looks more like highway=footway + footway=sidewalk instead of highway=path. A path is what we in the US often call a trail. Can you review this edit?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166163758

I noticed you corrected the number of units. Are these connected buildings with a number of units or individual buildings. I can't tell from the imagery.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166154891

It looks like you accidentally dragged some nodes of trails and the Heart Lake Road. See changeset/166227960#map=19/48.457497/-122.634886.

I also disconnected the park boundary from the Heart Lake Road. Having them not connected helps others make edits to one of the features.

#TIP: street names are spelled out in OSM. The reason is that software has a hard time unabbreviating
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166130534

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166125990

Check out Skagit iMap for a better boundary for the park. https://www.skagitcounty.net/Maps/iMap/
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166086723

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166078903

I only see one business with that address.

Please use a brief description of your edit instead of added hashtag... Also, landuse=forest implies that the area is logged. A better tag is natural=wood. That describes what is there and leave open to it be just a wooded area and that someone could add the landuse=forest if the area is logged.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166087149

This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

Why are you removing addresses from businesses?
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166087064

It looks like you deleted an address node. It's a good idea to leave the address node for future businesses.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166050454

It looks like you added a park that is already mapped in OSM, but with a different boundary. Can you determine which boundary is correct and remove the wrong one? Let me know if you need help
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166050362

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166049300

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165967229