Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.

One suggestion. Try not to connect the trail to the park landuse. If either change, it requires disconnecting nodes.

Also, Is this a trail or more like a gravel sidewalk? OSM, which started in England, uses British English terms. So a path lis like a trail and a footway is more like a sidewalk. I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163378278

A couple of questions. You tagged a house on E. Mill Plain Blvd as a place of worship. It looks more like a plain house. Is it really a place of worship, or maybe the pastors house?

Also you tagged two house as tourism=apartment. I think a better way is to tag it as building=apartments. There building just for tourism so it you may be correct. We just don't see that many.

Can you review this edits? I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163229741

It is my understanding that there must be some sort of barrier between ways before the way is separated. See osm.wiki/Dual_carriageway. I just drove over it yesterday and I don't recall seeing any barriers. Can you review this edit?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163306481

Those signs indicate that the road is privately owned and maintained. The correct tag would be ownership=private. Unless there is a no trespassing sign, the access=private should not be used. access=destination might be appropriate. Can you review this edit? Thanks
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163289956

That does not look like a meadow?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163231910

Why did you remove building that are still shown on imagery?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163231539

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163216636

I removed some of what you did. The secondary highway is likely a service road. I'll send you more info on OSM in a message. You may want to read the wiki on how to map features.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163208815

This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

This appears to be all fictitious. I'm reverting it. If you disagree, please let me know. I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163148265

#TIP: Street names are spelled out in OSM because software has a hard time unabbreviating.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163185207

A couple of issues - first the leveled land, should like be tagged as landuse=brownfield instead of using a descriptive name. The fence tag is appropriate.

Also the trail you added, stops just short of SE 41st Dr. Should it connect? Also, this looks like private property. Is there a public path there? The owners may be concerned if people start walking on their property.

Not sure why your removed the highway=residential tag from NE 126th Ct, but I added it back.

Also you added a duplicate driveway, house and shed. I removed the duplicates. Also, we don't use descriptive names, like Shed or Driveway, instead tag them appropriately, for example highway=service + service=driveway
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163146399

You should check out the wiki for how to map pedestrian ways. For example, the crossing:island is typically a node at the island, though I have drawn it as a way, but just for the island. See crossing:island=*.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163098843

Looks like you acidentially extended NE 71st St next to and old path. I've removed the path.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163075569

Why the access=destination? access=destination is typically used on private property to allow people to get to a destination. I don't think I've ever seen it in public spaces.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163020462

We typically do not remove informal trails, instead we mark them as informal and access=no. Could you review your edit?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163020191

Just to let you know the park was already mapped.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163015405

i have reverted this edit. This is not what the community has agreed on. Please see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/gulf-of-america-gulf-of-mexico/124571 and osm.wiki/Gulf_of_Mexico before editing the name of this feature. Undiscussed changes will be reverted.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163066760

i have reverted this edit. This is not what the community has agreed on. Please see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/gulf-of-america-gulf-of-mexico/124571 and osm.wiki/Gulf_of_Mexico before editing the name of this feature. Undiscussed changes will be reverted.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163066448

I'd probably go ahead and rename it Davis Peak Road unless it's signed. Many of the roads in the Cascade mountains are from very old data, and likely wrong.