I'm reverting this changeset. Please consult with the community before renaming Mount Denali.

The alt_name should also be reverted. Happy to do so

This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

You accidentally dragged nodes of ways which I fixed. It is easy to do with the editor. I usually do a right click to move the map.

Also, access=no basically says no one can use the road. I went ahead and changed it to access=private. There are other possibilities. Check out the wiki at access=*
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161508930

Typically we don't remove trails because they are not official, instead, we mark them as informal. Having informal trail in OSM can help rescue workers when looking for lost hikers.

Please review your edit.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161465110

There are a number of "businesses" all operating from the same unit. Is it one business or multiple?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161447634

Check out Snohomish County SCOPI https://scopi.snoco.org/Html5Viewer/Index.html?configBase=https://scopi.snoco.org/Geocortex/Essentials/REST/sites/SCOPI/viewers/SCOPI/virtualdirectory/Resources/Config/Default It is helpful for determining road types and names
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161445204

#TIP: Leave brief changeset comments when saving and uploading your edit. See osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments for more information
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161442821

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161361504

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161331072

Instead of access=no, use access=private as you did on the bridge.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161318095

Can you clarify, is the road privately owned and does it have a no trespassing sign? From what I can see Bing street view imagery does not show a no trespassing.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161293167

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.

One suggestion, a tag is needed for the laundromat. I'd suggest shop=laundry.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161275923

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161260922

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161248121

The pier is likely not open to motor vehicles, including aircraft. Typically it is just for pedestrians. Also you may want to look up moorings on the wiki. See mooring=*
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161252734

#TIP: When removing a business, it a good to leave the address which can likely be reused. The browser editor, iD, has a tool to remove all but the address. Just right click on the business and select the ⋁ icon.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161247881

This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

We typically tag the landuse of the church as such since it is all religious land. I would recommend adding it back as a lanuse=religious. See landuse=religious
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161219657

I would suggest adding back in the tags amenity=place_of_worship, building=church, and religion=christian otherwise it will not be found in a search.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161217146

#TIP: OSM spells out street names - the reason is that software has a hard time unabbreviating. Can you expand the street name?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161186763

According to Lincoln County WA, GIS data, the RV park doesn't extend to Southeast Brace Street. See https://lincolnwa.maps.arcgis.com/apps/View/index.html?appid=bece73b1a4b04a01b776af8f832094a2. Can you review this edit and update as needed? Let me know if you need help
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161185031