OpenStreetMap
Glassman's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 160069209 | #TIP: OSM considers driveway private by the nature of their use so we don't tag it as private unless there is a non-trespassing sign or gate.
|
|
| 160068378 | 86th Avenue Northeast actually continues to where it turns into the section of road that ends in the cul-de-sac. I went ahead and fix it.
|
|
| 160068282 | These are considered highway=service + service=driveway. I made the change.
|
|
| 160068254 | These are considered highway=service + service=driveway. I made the change.
|
|
| 160039958 | Instead of connecting the path to the parking lot, it's better to connect it to the road to allow routing to the final destination. Can you fix?
|
|
| 160040809 | what is unpaved=pathway tag? I could not find it in the wiki.
|
|
| 160045052 | Why the foot=private tag? Isn't this open to anyone to walk?
|
|
| 160045052 | Why the foot=private tag? Isn't this open to anyone to walk?
|
|
| 160045052 | Why the foot=private tag? Isn't this open to anyone to walk?
|
|
| 160045052 | Why the foot=private tag? Isn't this open to anyone to walk?
|
|
| 160045052 | Why the foot=private tag? Isn't this open to anyone to walk?
|
|
| 160005762 | I added the city and unit number to the address
|
|
| 159972729 | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
|
| 159972413 | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
|
| 159972729 | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
|
| 159935765 | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
|
| 159935714 | Typically these instructions are added as a node to the road. Nothing wrong with this but it isn't all that useful.
|
|
| 159935663 | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
|
| 159935608 | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
|
| 159973752 | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|