Glassman's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 155983422 | All I see is nodes - no line strings/ways tagged as roads. Could you review this import? |
|
| 155928243 | Please leave a brief descriptive changeset comment, such as added school. Factic situation on all of your changeseets doesn't help anyone.
|
|
| 56617156 | The DWG received a message that 342 Duffield Road Derby DE22 1ER should be the southern most of the two semi-detached houses. Could you look this over? |
|
| 155378079 | Thanks for fixing the right bridge. And you can see why I didn't want to be the one to close the wrong bridge. |
|
| 155378079 | I noticed you updated the tags on Rainy River Rail Lift bridge. Did you know that the bridge collapsed? See https://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/rail-bridge-collapses-us-canada-border-112898270. Are you familiar with the bridge or just updating rail tags? Be good if someone familiar with it could map it as closed. |
|
| 73943273 | Thanks for getting back. BC Archaeology was asking about Asking Rock, node/6761055180. The node was updated by another user to update the tags. I will advise BC Archaeology that the site is signed. |
|
| 73943273 | The DWG received a complaint from the BC Archaeology Branch, about mapping archaeological sites in BC. One of the sites mapped is a sensitive burial cairn site. They provided this document which describes the access to their information. https://mycloud.snowandsnow.us/index.php/s/zKrGCxt6RZtBQss. If the sites you added are not publicly known, can you please delete them? Please let me know so I can respond to their request. |
|
| 138537449 | The DWG received a complaint from the BC Archaeology Branch, about mapping archaeological sites in BC. One of the sites mapped is a sensitive burial cairn site. They provided this document which describes the access to their information. https://mycloud.snowandsnow.us/index.php/s/zKrGCxt6RZtBQss. If the sites you added are not publicly known, can you please delete them? Please let me know so I can respond to their request. |
|
| 148996829 | The DWG received a complaint from the BC Archaeology Branch, about mapping archaeological sites in BC. One of the sites mapped is a sensitive burial cairn site. The provided this document which describes the access to their information. https://mycloud.snowandsnow.us/index.php/s/zKrGCxt6RZtBQss. If the sites you added are not publically know, can you please delete them. Please let me know so I can respond their request. |
|
| 50214730 | Nat - You added the Goat Basin - I'm trying to find a better tag. One website just calls it a natural depression. Unfortunately, basin in OSM usually means water reservoir. Any good suggestions on how to better tag this? |
|
| 153125547 | #TIP: connect the sidewalk to the main entrance. While it seems trivial, it allows the router to take a person right to the front door. Also - -please leave a changeset comment. It will help you if you ever have to go back to fix a changeset and help others.
|
|
| 151999302 | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. I'd recommend updating the government=yes tag to government=transportation. See government=* for help with the government tag.
|
|
| 151792177 | I think you want to add landuse=construction to the entire area. See osm.wiki/Construction for more info on how to use the construction tag
|
|
| 151792114 | None of the building match the roof outline. Also - does the path end just before the street or is it connected?
|
|
| 151792114 | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.
|
|
| 151784250 | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
|
| 151795435 | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
|
| 151782913 | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
|
| 151782802 | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
|
| 151752687 | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|