OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
144983785

#TIP: Add in the stream for the waterfall. Also waterfalls should be tagged as a waterway=waterfall. Can you update this edit?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144983785

144981348

#TIP: instead of deleting then redrawing the object - just update the tags. By doing so, it save the history of an object
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144981348

144981531

#TIP: OSM was started in England so we use their road classifications and British English spellings. An unclassified road is just a rural residential road. This road looks more like a service road. Can you review this edit?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144981531

144978499

The area is tagged as Washougal Waterfront Park, yet the current imagery shows new constructions - like apartment buildings. Are you familiar with this area - do you know what the boundary of the park should look like?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144978499

144978373

Can you redraw the school boundary to better match the imagery. Let me know if you need help
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144978373

144976609

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144976609

144958013

You posted a fixme on Ridgefield's admin boundary - it is not a road, just the admin boundary of the city.

You added a bunch of houses, but each outline should closely match the roof outline. None appear to do so. Can you redo the building outlines on this edit and your subsequent one? Let me know if you need help. I'll send you more info in a message.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144958013

144886340

I just noticed you duplicated the residential road, both in the new development and on the existing Burnett Road. I remove the duplicates.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144886340

144886340

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.

You can add the park info to the park polygon insteading of using a node.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144886340

144875261

#TIP: Sometimes the imagery has shifted. Instead of moving or redrawing the building the imagery can be shifted by using the background icon on the right side of the editor. Towards the bottom is the ability to create a new offset.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144875261

144875365

#TIP: square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q"
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144875365

144808909

I think we are getting off to a bad start. I'm only trying help you edit successfully in OSM. OSM is a community project with over a million volunteer mappers and a few paid ones by large corporations like Amazon, Meta (Facebook), and others. One of the standards of OSM is that we map what is on the ground—including in places where it is against the law to do so, such as North Korea or even China.

You are certainly correct in removing the name of the Cascades State Park Trail. If it doesn't exist there it shouldn't be tagged. However, if there is a road there, it should be tagged.

And I fully agree that Washington State can't designate features in another state let alone the Coeur d'Alene Tribe or any tribe within Washington State for that matter.

144812956

#TIP: Typically we either draw a polygon around the pump area/and or the building. Instead of using a descriptive name, Closed/Defunct, you can show the opening_hours=closed
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144812956

144809186

I disconnected your landuse nodes from the power line. They should never be connected.

Also - parcels are not mapped in OSM. The entire area is already marked as natural=wood. landuse=forest implies that it is harvested.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144809186

144808909

From the imagery, it appears that a road exists on what was once a railrail bed. As long as a feature exists, it can and should be mapped in OSM. It is appropriate to tag it as no access if it is posted as such.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144808909

144773959

I removed the no tags on all of the various forms of transportation but left the access=no. From looking at the imagery you can see a vehicle so they must be allowed. access=no should be sufficient.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144773959

144774031

The correct tag for driveways is highway=service + service=driveway. Without the highway=service, the driveway won't render or be used to route to the destination. I fixed the tagging on both driveways. Let me know if you have any questions.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144774031

144736053

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144736053

144733341

By making the driveway oneway, it would be impossible to get out. Can you remove the oneway=yes tag?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144733341

144708238

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.

Does 217th Place Southeast sit on what was the old railroad track? If so, you can add the tag, railway=raised to the road.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144708238