OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
142744050

This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142744050

142743650

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142743650

142743230

again we don't use descriptive names. As an alternative you could tag it as demolished:building=yes
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142743230

142742640

#TIP: we don't use descriptive names in OSM. Just a tag describing the function of the object is needed. For example, building=chicken_coop or building=henhouse
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142742640

142734782

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142734782

142732397

When a business is one of many in a building, just use a node for the information. I removed the duplicate building and left a node with the brewery info.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142732397

142732397

This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142732397

142687550

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142687550

142675977

#TIP: descriptive names are not used in OSM. Just tag the object to it's function. Can you review this edit?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142675977

142680170

This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142680170

142678342

The access=no isn't really needed on drive through lanes.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142678342

142676333

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142676333

142675824

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142675824

142691916

I looked at Skagit County Assessors' records - they show no tax parcel record of the land. I'm guessing it belongs to the state.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142691916

142639138

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142639138

142638715

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142638715

142638846

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142638846

142639101

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142639101

142638846

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142638846

142637461

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142637461