OpenStreetMap
Glassman's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 139585039 | The county has both addresses shown for that building. Plus the building should have at least one address. Can you review this edit and add the correct address back? Thanks - I'll send you more info on OSM in a DM
|
|
| 139457738 | The roads you marked as private are privately owned but are open for public use. You can add a tag operator= with the name of the organization responsible for maintaining the roads. Also - the name of the road is just Valleybrook Lane. Adding private rd will only confuse routers. Please review your edit and correct as needed. I'll send you more info on OSM in a DM
|
|
| 139358288 | check out changeset/139358288#map=19/47.27134/-122.31344&layers=Y where you can see bike routes in blue. Yours appears to be a duplicate. Can I suggest removing it? |
|
| 139436334 | I removed the mail box you added. A post box is the blue USPS letter drop usually located near a street. Second, we don't allow personal information, Mom's house, in OSM - for their protection. Feel free to add the address and apartment name to the building.
|
|
| 139366673 | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
|
| 139358288 | The cycleway was already tagged on Milton Road South with cycleway:left=shoulder. See cycleway=*#Dedicated_cycle_lanes for more info. Can you review this edit and update it as necessary.
|
|
| 139315648 | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
|
| 139276810 | Another user restored the driveways you deleted. In OSM if a feature is verifiable it can be included in the database. Tagging it as private stops routers from using the road. Let me know if you have any questions. I'll send you more info on OSM in a DM
|
|
| 139274932 | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
|
| 139413211 | From what I understand, these roads are privately owned but not marked as no trespassing or something similar. For privately owned roads that are not marked, the access tag should be access=permissive. See access=* Please review this edit. Let me know if you have any questions.
|
|
| 139275082 | To split the street, select the street and while holding down the shift key, select the node where you want to split the way. The right click and select the scissors to split the way. Then you can update the relation tags for the bus route you want to change. Let me know if you need help. I usually do most of my editing using the JOSM editor which makes editing transit routes easier. But JOSM has a somewhat higher learning curve. (At least for me). You can also reach out for help on Slack, osmus.slack.com to join. |
|
| 139157767 | According to https://www.airnav.com/airport/95WA black diamond airport is still in operation. Can you review this edit? I'll send you more info on OSM in DM
|
|
| 139190678 | Thanks for getting back to me. OSM does map difficult trails using a sac_scale. See sac_scale=* I understand that someone with little or no experience shouldn't be using difficult trails. Those trails should be tagged accordingly. Removing the trails just invites someone else to add them back. Especially those with Strava heatmaps. At least one of the trails removed, claimed they used Strava heatmaps to align the trail. |
|
| 139190678 | Why are you deleting these trails? Cleaning doesn't help us understand what you are trying to accomplish.
|
|
| 133725551 | Why are they appropriate for public trails?
|
|
| 139163061 | Again why remove the multipolygons?
|
|
| 139161490 | Why did you remove the hole ways? These are legitimate features for golf courses? See leisure=golf_course
|
|
| 138962465 | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.
|
|
| 138767723 | You make a good point about it being completely gone. Tagging something abandoned or razed works really well with streets, buildings and railways but in this case I agree it should be restored. I have restored your edit. Thanks again. Let me know if you have any questions on OSM that I can help with.
|
|
| 138767723 | The pervious editor tagged the trail as abandoned. By doing so, it keeps people from adding it back because they see some remnants of the trail. I'm going to revert this edit to keep those tags. Let me know if you have any questions.
|