OpenStreetMap
Glassman's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 137150082 | I went ahead and added the service road on the east side of 101. Also added some buildings in the park and near by. Question - I notice the Hwy 101 bridge over the Dosewallips River is very long. Is that correct? |
|
| 137188324 | Can you review this edit? aeroway=jet_bridge + highway=corridor is the documented way of adding jet ways. See aeroway=jet_bridge. Let me know if you have any questions.
|
|
| 137151534 | #TIP: limit your edit to a small geographical area. Save and upload before editing in a distant location.
|
|
| 137149274 | #TIP: square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q". Otherwise your edit looks great.
|
|
| 137148014 | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
|
| 137147407 | #TIP: OSM expands street names abbreviations. The reason is that software has a hard time unabbreviating. I went ahead and expand the street name.
|
|
| 137107632 | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
|
| 137082816 | I'm not sure if it was intentional or not, but the service road moved from the lake side to connect to the alley doesn't seem to fit the imagery. I took the liberty of moving it back. Let me know if that isn't correct. I can revert my edit.
|
|
| 137150082 | I think you are doing great. It was just the missing roads that drew my attention. And I'm glad to see another park ranger updating OSM. I've been in contact with WA Parks and Rec over the years. Mainly with adding park boundaries. Yours wasn't one of them. It appears from the bing imagery that there is still a road into the parking area at the southeast end of the park (next to a restroom). The imagery isn't real clear at the northeast end. Bing seems to show the service road block off, but the new maxar and NAIP imagery it isn't clear. I'm happy to add the service road back in but you have the local knowledge - which I respect. |
|
| 137150082 | Looking at the WA parks site, https://parks.wa.gov/DocumentCenter/View/1862/Dosewallips-State-Park-PDF, it looks like some of the roads remain. Can you review the document and your edit? Let me know if you need help.
|
|
| 136982486 | It looks like you created duplicate entries for the hotel that was already mapped.
|
|
| 136885442 | OSM has its own schema for addresses. Which may differ slightly from "official" records. Using a uniform addressing scheme allows routers to work everywhere. |
|
| 136885542 | Thanks for the information. I had looked at more recent Maxar and King County imagery but it wasn't shown. |
|
| 136924660 | #TIP: sidewalks in OSM are footways that are next to a road. OSM started in England so we use British English for the tags and English's terms for roads and other features.
|
|
| 136910606 | Can you review this edit. The address says 11th Avenue but this building is a block away from 11th Avenue. Also the website for ashtown brewing says they are open at a new location. See https://ashtownbrewing.com/
|
|
| 136902393 | Can you review this edit - it looks like the house is bigger than what you redrew it as. It is hard to see from the imagery but it looks like it extends to the south just past the driveway.
|
|
| 136885542 | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found. Can you change the shape of the building to match the current aerial imagery?
|
|
| 136885442 | #TIP: the unit number B should be in the unit field of the editor.
|
|
| 136850133 | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
|
| 136849976 | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|