Landuse is not intended for building. Instead change the building tag from yes to retail.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174210014

These devices should be stand alone nodes. I removed it from the street way. It does seem like a strange place for a camera compared to others that have been added.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174176132

#TIP: It would help if you could add the name for the sculpture and artist if you know it. I did notice you placed it near the Piloti.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174131158

One suggestion, instead of adding a node to an existing feature, use a stand alone node. I look for the pole's shadows to place the node.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174078160

Done

Thanks. I had looked up the address and it sounded like it was still there, plus the imagery made it look new. I'll remove the building and features around it.

Are you talking about the bldg next to Claudia Driscoll Park?

I'm not sure sidepath is the right tag. Is there a physical path that bikes can use, if so, I'd add the path and show bicycle=yes. Can bicycles and pedestrians use the gate? If so you can access for them. See bicycle=use_sidepath and access=*
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174029845

I went ahead and deleted the SEO entire changeset because of the dragged nodes, but thanks for attempting to fix. (I have little patience for SEO crappy edits)

#TIP: Don't add personal information, even in a changeset comment. We want to insure privacy.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173997670

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173987719

Sorry about that, that was a mistake. I have, hopefully, undid the error.

This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset/172501426.

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/173951633 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed mass edit

#TIP: Add the flock device as a separate node. I look for the pole's shaddow to place the node.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173908084

#TIP: The device should be on a stand alone node not on a existing way. I look for the pole's shaddow to determine where to place the node.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173865424

This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173817909

This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173817909

This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173817909

The building outline is already tagged with the address. It just doesn't render so you can see it.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173789792