I fixed the geometry and tagged it as a building.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173121817

This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173121817

This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173118970

Check out highway=* for the definition of highway=living_street. Edit reverted. I'll send you more info in a message.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173118970

Check out highway=* for the definition of highway=tertiary. Edit reverted. I'll send you more info in a message.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173118825

LIDAR does show this as a road, though it could be overgrown.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173118294

#TIP: flock devices should not be connected to ways, like sidewalks. I usually look for a poles shadow when adding things like this. I went ahead and unglued the device.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173109136

Hey, pnorman, do you recall why you atted the not:name to 169th Street NE? According to the county it is a short 169th Pl NE that is connected to 169th St NE. I would normally change it, but it's rare to see not:name tag.

This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

Reverted for fake feature
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173070480

FYI, if you switch to the ESRI World imagery, you can see one completed house and the construction of another. Just select the background icon in the editor and select the ESRI World imagery.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173068501

#TIP: When adding address, the names are spelled out, for example, 1st Avenue South. The reason is that software has a hard time unabbreviating.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173026793

#TIP: What you might be seeing is the imagery offset has changed since this was first maped. To adjust the offset, select the background icon in the editor, the towards the bottom, move the imagery to match to the existing background
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173023532

Thanks for adding all of the sidewalks. it one of my favoriate things to do. If you are interested in adding more detail, check out osm.wiki/Foundation/Local_Chapters/United_States/Pedestrian_Working_Group/Guide. I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173037277

Sorry, my mistake, I was looking at the OSM rendering which is the same as a deleted way in OSMCha.org. I appologize for misundersanding the rendering.

Good luck mapping.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172935045

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172936925

I appears you may have acidentially remove part of the PCT and access to trails from the parking lot. Can you fix this? Let me know if you need help
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172935045

The road appears on the newest imagery, ESRI World, If the service road still exists, it would be better to add the tag access=no. That will keep people from adding it from imagery.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172884837

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172854519

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172854490

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172854285