OpenStreetMap
Glassman's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 170757998 | Why did you remove the tags amenity=cafe and cuisine=coffee_shop? You were correct when you first added them. Can you add them back?
|
|
| 170745623 | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
|
| 170746039 | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
|
| 170747214 | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
|
| 170745623 | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
|
| 170744952 | This is a good contribution but a better one would also include a tag to describe the business, such as amenity=cafe
|
|
| 170743505 | #TIP: We don't use descriptive names, just tag it properly has you have is sufficient.
|
|
| 170704922 | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found. It looks like you removed all but one polygon of a school bldg. And the one you added in the previous edit doesn't look right. Do ou have more information on the construction going on at the school?
|
|
| 170695759 | There appears to be two bike ways for the Tommy Thompson Parkway. User MulhollandWildcatCWU added them. Only one exists. I'd recommend keeping the one with the relation and removing the other. Can you do that or do you need help?
|
|
| 170695345 | ou tagged this as a bicycle road which should only happen if the road is signed. See bicycle_road=yes Also, the tag kerb extension ios typically a node where the curb extends out.
|
|
| 170685411 | If the business occupies the entire building, then just add the business to the building outline, otherwise just add a node, but not both. Can you review this edit?
|
|
| 170686180 | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. Please note that most alley's are not named. We only add a name if there is sign.
|
|
| 170685881 | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
|
| 170647032 | thanks for the update. |
|
| 170647032 | Unless the road is marked as no trespassing, the access=private is not appropriate. A better tag would be ownership=private.
|
|
| 170646060 | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
|
| 170641524 | It appears you added a building within a building which another user fixed. In cases like this, just add a node for the teen life center.
|
|
| 170634649 | typically the maxspeed is added to the road.
|
|
| 170596487 | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found. I have reverted this edit. None of the features look real.
|
|
| 170597877 | Islands in the sea also need the tag natural-coastline. The outline needs to have the ocean on the right hand side. See place=island Coastlines in OSM are very different from just about everything else in OSM.
|