This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

Please don't vandalize OSM. Both of your edits have been reverted.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162190830

This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

Please don't vandalize OSM
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162190750

FYI - an unclassified road is basically just a rural residential road. We do this because OSM was started in England so we use their road classification system. I mention this because you changed an unclassified road to residential.

I notice you removed a footway near West Railroad Avenue. Is there a reason you removed it?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162185970

The path was tagged as access=private. Because of that I reverted your edit but did add a tag ownership=private. If you disagree, please explain why. I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162139990

One website shows the site as active. See https://www.airnav.com/airport/WA75. Not sure how accurate the site is.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162138990

Thanks for fixing the house numbers. Please note that there is already a park. The address node is for the park. I'd suggest adding it back to the park boundary. Let me know if you need help.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162074654

I fixed the relationship and also removed the name from the guest house. We don't add names unless it is signed. Feel free to add it back if there is a sign.

I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162062476

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162014931

nickvet419 please read the comments in the community forum at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/gulf-of-america-gulf-of-mexico/124571 for a better understanding of how the community views this matter.

Can you add the names back that you believe are transliterations unless you know they are wrong. Also, official_name:en should not be there since we have the tag official_name. Which by the way, has not been made yet.

Why did you remove some of the names in other languages? Have you read the discussion on https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/gulf-of-america-gulf-of-mexico/124571/9 - Mostly about the Gulf of Mexico, but Denali is also included.
After reading the community forum, please explain why this edit shouldn't be reverted?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162068466

Can you fix this one as well. Add a parking lot and remove the parking_aisle you added.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161949195

I'd suggest creating an parking area polygon and tag it as you did the parking aisle. The parking aisle you added should be removed.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161948419

Instead of tagging the service streets with the park and ride name, add a polygon area for the parking lot and name it Wheaton Way Park & Ride with park_ride=yes
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161914984

A couple of questions. Is the place under construction?

Is the parking in building? If so create a node at the entrance to the parking and tag it as amenity=parking_entrance + parking=underground. The service road should end there.

The residential road you added should really be highway=service with no name.

Can you review your edit and correct it as needed. Let me know if you need help. I'll send more info on OSM in a message.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161914643

The community has not agreed upon rename the gulf. See the discussion at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/gulf-of-america-gulf-of-mexico/124571/178 and join in to the discussion.

This edit will be reverted.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161992832

They appear to be correctly map as driveways along with access=private which is kind of redundant. I'm going to revert this changeset. Please note that verifiable features can be added to OSM.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161881145

I received the same information from another user. When I saw the name it jumped out at me as a prank and I wanted it removed if it was. I guess not. :-)

I have reverted this changeset. The name has not been agreed upon by the community. I suggest you read https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/gulf-of-america-gulf-of-mexico/124571/87.

I can't find that peak on USGS maps. Can you point me to the source