I think you want highway=path or highway=footway. A path is what we call a trail while a footway is more line a sidewalk.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148988541

#TIP: spell out street names - the reason is that software has a hard time unabbreviating.

Also - I suspect the roads should be tagged ownership=private not access=private. Can you review this edit?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148937646

#TIP: We spell out street names in OSM - the reason is that software has a hard time unabbreviating. Can you fix these two houses. Also - don't use a name unless there is actually a posted name on the house.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148924192

Yes - the street should be South 38th Street. One of the nice things about OSM is that you can update features anytime.

I'm in the process of updating roads in Lincoln County. The County calls the road State Route 2 except when inside of a city. I'm curious where the name "Sunset Highway" came from?

#TIP: Streetnames are spelled out in OSM - the reason is that software has a hard time unabbreviating.

Good catch. That road is mostly alley and is tagged as highway=service +service=alley.

#TIP: street names are spelled out in OSM. The reason is that software has a hard time unabbreviating names.

Did you send the user a message explaining why you reverted the changeset?

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.

Just edit the existing road. If you notice, there is a version number for every feature. It is interesting to look at some of the features with multiple updates over time. For example, US 97, just north of the bridge over Peshastin Creek, is on version 10

OSM, because it was started in the UK, uses England's road classifications. unclassified is basically a rural residential street. If that is what it is, it's unlikely not to allow access. However, if it is privately owned and maintained, then an appropriate tag would be ownership=private. Can you review this changeset to make sure the way is properly tagged?

#TIP: when a business is just one of many in a building, just use a node for the business. Then add the address to the building.

If this is a MTB trail, I'd recommend tagging it as highway=path + bike=designated. The other tags you added are great.

highway=cycleway is what you typically find in a city or like the
Burke Gilman trail or the Centennial Trail out in the country.

By restoring the area I indended to say by removing any sign of a trail, plant the area with native plants. Even place large boulders or fallen trees across the trail.

The access=no tag is sufficient to show the paths should not be used. However, if there is still illegal usage of trails, then, ideally, the property owner should post no trespassing signs and restore the area where the trails are located.

Park staff often use this method to keep people off what is called "informal trails".

The trails were already tagged as private. What are you hoping to accomplish by adding in tags of foot, horse, bike = no? They seem redundant.

I'd recommend adding the gate, just add a node to the road where the gate is located. Tag it as barrier=gate. I'm guessing that the access for vehicles would be permissive.

Why did you tag this cycleway as access=no? That means no one can use it. Also, is this really a mountain bike trails? If so use osm.wiki/Mountain_biking to help you tag it correctly. Let me know if you need help.

Not sure what you were trying to accomplish. I removed your two sections of road. Are you trying to also add a house? if so just draw an outline around the structure then tag it with the house number, street, and city. Let me know if you need help.