Glassman's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 146923631 | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. #TIP: square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q"
|
|
| 146919305 | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found. From bing imagery these look like oneway links. I've gone ahead and fixed them. Let me know if I got it wrong.
|
|
| 146916936 | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
|
| 146844787 | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. Bus stops typically have more info in the node. Read osm.wiki/Public_transport for more information of the subject.
|
|
| 146844614 | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. #TIP: Microsoft buildings are known for not being square. To square a building select the outline then just type a "q" they will look more professional.
|
|
| 146877459 | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
|
| 146877365 | Again, it looks like a service road. OSM started in England so we use Englands road classifications and British English for our tags. unclassified is basically just a rural residential road.
|
|
| 146875999 | The residential road added near Tilton River State Park looks more like a service road. Should be tagged as highway=service.
|
|
| 146836688 | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
|
| 146836688 | #TIP: square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q" for a more professional look.
|
|
| 146836452 | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. #TIP: sometimes the imagery is offset. It can be adjusted in the layers icon on the right side of the editor. The offset setting is located towards the bottom of the layers list.
|
|
| 146836347 | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
|
| 146885498 | you add two different names and one unnamed section of what appears to be the same stream. Should all of the streams be named Baker Creek?
|
|
| 146882029 | Why did you add the tag layer=-1? Is the building underground?
|
|
| 146833425 | Thanks for adding the ballot drop box location. Much needed.
|
|
| 146882623 | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
|
| 146846342 | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
|
| 146843477 | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
|
| 146840736 | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
|
| 146834703 | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. I would recommend leaving the address as a node when removing buildings or areas. In many cases the county reuses the address for new construction.
|