OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
146731418

This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

I reverted this changeset. The building was already there.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146731418

146728316

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146728316

146728201

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146728201

146727872

Why did you remove the address? Was it incorrect?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146727872

146693692

Thanks for fixing the tag
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146693692

146694429

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146694429

146694520

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146694520

146692930

Also - unless there is an existing fence, just add a node to the way where the gate is located.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146692930

146692930

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.

#TIP: instead of tagging buildings as area=yes, use building=yes.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146692930

146691991

Isn't this part of the nearby school? If so the access shouldn't be private. See access=* for help picking the best access tag to use.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146691991

146692822

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146692822

146692644

Can you explain why the restrooms are private? They look to be part of the high/middle school.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146692644

146692440

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146692440

146692234

your edit looks good except that we do not use descriptive names, like name=Swingset. The tag should be sufficient. Can you review this edit?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146692234

146729097

Asking with the new shop tags, do you have new business names
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146729097

146576563

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146576563

146576506

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146576506

146576472

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146576472

146576426

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.

Just a couple of minor suggestions. Phone numbers in the US should start with +1- then the area code and phone number as you entered it.

Website URL should include http or https.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146576426

146572192

If I understand this edit, you removed the old Kent boundary that was inside of the existing Auburn boundary. Is that correct? And is there an Lea Hill neighborhood?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146572192