Glassman's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 136720864 | That looks more like natural=wood instead of a tree row. Can you review this edit?
|
|
| 136721149 | It looks like the house is larger than what you drew. You might try a different imagery. Imagery can be found on the background layer icon on the right side of the editor.
|
|
| 136721086 | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
|
| 136720994 | Same suggestion as the last one. If the fields each have a different name then it is appropriate to tag them with the name.
|
|
| 136720972 | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
|
| 136720927 | Baseball fields should be tagged as leisure=pitch
|
|
| 136720842 | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
|
| 136720806 | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
|
| 136718145 | It looks like you changed a turning circle to a signal light. I'm assuming that is an error. I've changed it back. #TIP: square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q" - they will look much nicer. Also - please limit your edit to a small geographical area. Save and upload before moving. In this case from Colorado to Washington.
|
|
| 136717537 | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found. This edit looks like part of a tasking manager project. If so it should include the task number in the changeset comments. Also - place=isolated_dwelling is a locality with one or two households. This looks like a village. Can you review these edits - I see you tagged a number of buildings as place=isoloated_dwellings.
|
|
| 136716746 | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
|
| 136716728 | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
|
| 136716695 | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
|
| 136716649 | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. I see you removed the descriptive name from your last edit - thanks
|
|
| 136716294 | #TIP: we don't use descriptive names in OSM. The tag is sufficient.
|
|
| 136715661 | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. #TIP: save and upload your edit before moving to a geographic distant location
|
|
| 136716495 | Was this edit part of a task? If so it should be labeled with the task number.
|
|
| 136679746 | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. #TIP: square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q" to make the building look much nicer
|
|
| 136678127 | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good except for the dragged node.
|
|
| 136676292 | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|