Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for the edit. Because the housenumber and street is already tagged on a node, it is not needed on the building. Therefore I've removed it from the building.

Was looking at other roads with access=no - saw this one which looked a bit suspicious, is it still closed? way/50495012/history

Is this still closed? way/91342263/history

I'm guessing this isn't supposed to still be access=no? way/384765378/history

Managed to fix this (after I saw the solution posted on reddit), there was a duplicate section here way/671167498

I'm wondering if it should even be in OSM then if it's not signed on the ground. Or at least it should be tagged as state=proposed like some other routes so that renders differently.

Hi, just wondering why you've set part of the road to construction? Are there roadworks here and if so how long are they going on for?

Hi, is this a signed route?

Hi, what is your source for this edit? Surely there is still a connection between these two roads for pedestrians?

Hi, I'm assuming you didn't mean to set this railway line as being in a tunnel? way/143768619

oops sorry, that was me - there was a missing section to the west and I carried on adding to the relation, forgetting it went along the coast!

Sorry for the delay. The reason I asked is because the track was surveyed a few months ago by a local mapper, and I didn't notice the gate had been tagged as private.
I tried the Komoot route planner and it only directed me through the gate using the moutain bike profile. However as the gate is private it shouldn't really be directing anyone that way - maybe worth raising it as a bug with them.

If it's in the middle of a route then I'd say it should be part of the route - the two ferries near Fort William are a very important part of NCN 78 (so that you avoid the A82).
And if NCN 1, 75, 78 include ferries but 73 doesn't, then surely that means it should be added to the 73 route and not removed from others? :)

I've reverted these changes.

Hi, I've remove the five duplicate parks you added as there's already one on the map at the same location.

Hi, thanks for adding the fixme - however it's probably better if you add a note like this to the location as it's more likely to be seen by other mappers :)
note/1921623

Hi, saw you had added a long housenumber here: node/6733525285/history - for a range of numbers you're better offer using an addr:interpolation line and the high/low housenumbers at each end.

Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for adding the building to resolve the note. Just to point out that in the editor there is a function to "square" the corners - either press Q or right click - so that the building is the correct shape. :)

Hi, looks like you've moved features at Gorebridge station to match the Maxar imagery - however, this is out of alignment with Bing, and also OSSV to which the railway line is drawn from.

Why remove the ferry crossing?