Probably because landuse=commercial is not the correct tag - is there a better one? But I was querying why you removed "industrial=bu" as I'm assuming should have been "bus".

If you can't get a vehicle along there, then yeah it should be a path of some sort.

Why did you remove the industrial tag?

These buildings seem out of alignment with existing OSM features, and don't seem to line up with any imagery or the cadastral parcels. Did you accidentally offset the Bing imagery or something before you started mapping?

Hi, just wondering what your source is for this edit?
And presumably this bridge would also be non directional? way/954878631

Hi, do you know how the path crosses this fence here? node/5912552636

Do you not think it would be a good idea to add a shop=* tag to this?

If the burn is underground there surely there isn't a ford here? :) node/9241078533

Hi, what routing problems are you referring to?

Hi, not sure why you replaced the houses already there with a single building, but I've mapped some more houses.
Feel free to some address nodes if you know the house numbers around here.

Yeah I did, south of the coal reserve looks like a field now on Maxar. Easier to remove than try to make smaller, but I've forgot to re-add the grass/scrub!

Just wondering why you removed the access tags?

Thanks for the reply. Unfortunately that tag is pretty useless as it's a bit subjective and not clearly defined. It's also only used about 2,000 times instead of the much more popular tower+tower:type=communication. :)

Not sure if you are aware but the Bing imagery is slightly out of alignment with the existing data
- you should use the OSMUK Cadastral Parcels layer to help align Bing before editing.

Was updating this area and noticed this road was set as removed - way/718464024 - however on the latest Maxar imagery there seems to be some sort of road/path there and this map shows it as a cycle path: https://www.transport.gov.scot/media/48142/a9-dualling-luncarty-to-pass-of-birnam-new-cycle-and-pedestrian-paths.pdf
Do you the exact situation?

Hi, if there are two house numbers here you'd be better adding two nodes with the separate address details.

Why did you change node/4457628592/history to a man_made=communications_tower?

Is the ATM still there?

Hi, not sure why you moved these buildings?

Can you provide a link to where you got the coastline from? Seems to be slightly different to OS StreetView's blue MHWS.
Also, are you able to reconnect the various streams that used to connect to the coastline, e.g. node/282465190