In that case, as we can't really have each fairway tagged as an individual golf course, I've added them to a relation and removed the larger area. relation/12910287

Hi, I've removed the golf course tag from each individual hole you mapped and added a rough outline of the golf course instead, feel free to improve it. way/960212522

The preset list is non-exhaustive and shipwrecks are more common :)
Going by the photo here: https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/2083350 I've changed it to a memorial plaque. Not sure if needs a separate historic=aircraft_wreck

I thought HBOS was just the company name of the merged banks. But anyway I've fixed those two, going by Mapillary/Geograph and confirmed on the BOS website.

Think there's a difference between "normal" missing data and the need for someone to check something specific in this case, which is exactly the sort of thing that a note should be used for?

Notes can be seen by users who are surveying an area using the StreetComplete app, easily shown on osm.org and can be viewed in an RSS feed. IMO more likely to be seen and acted upon than a fixme :)

Might be worth adding the PO opening hours if you can get them :)

Is the path alongside the A702 you've tagged as bicycle=designated actually a signed shared use path or just a narrow pavement?

HBOS isn't a bank so not sure why you added that name? And it would also be better if you added a note to the map instead of a fixme tag, as they are more likely to be noticed, surveyed, and fixed.

Not sure how access=no on a path where the tag is not needed is an improvement.

Right, but this is the only part of the towpath around here which has access=no. And with bike/foot/horse=yes, the access=no tag seems redundant since vehicles can't go on a highway=path anyway. So unless the towpath is closed, think it's best to remove it (it'll render properly on the map as well)

What's the reason for way/24653034 being access=no?

I first saw it on the talk-gb mailing list, seems like https://osmuk.org/cadastral-parcels/ explains more.

It's OS data so should be fairly accurate. Though I suppose the main thing is to have a consistency in the town (with whatever background is used) to avoid various bits being out of alignment!

Hi, just a comment on your use of fixmes. It's probably better to use the OSM notes feature as people are more likely to notice them with the notes layer rather than the fixme tag in the data. :)

Sorry to be a pain, but would you mind turning on the OSMUK Cadastral Parcels layer and aligning Bing first? :) Seems to be about 3,-4.5 offset here.

Hi, thanks for the edit.
Is this retail development now open? If so the landuse=construction should be removed, and Home Bargains could be tagged as shop=variety_store.

Hi, welcome back to OSM :) Just wanted to let you know that generally the new Bing imagery is slightly out of alignment with the old Bing (which is now Esri clarity).

If you have a look at background > overlays in the editor, you can turn on "OSMUK Cadastral Parcels" to help align Bing - I used about 4,-3 in this changeset: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=106160816

Cheers

Why have you changed this to a motorway?

Hmm, I considered deli for another refillery shop but the wiki mentions fine foods, meats, cheeses, etc.
Suppose a refillery shop is like a mini-supermarket but just with a different method of shopping for products?

Not local to WL though I do keep an eye on what's happening in OSM :)

I would say if it's expected to be changed for a decent amount of time - a few months perhaps? - and you can keep an eye out and revert it back if the speed limits return to what they were, then I'd say change them in OSM.

Hi, I noticed this road had been updated from 20 to 30mph changeset/104148939
I suspect the mapper who did it is not local as they mentioned GPS data in a reply to me: changeset/104210067
So is the road definitely 20mph?

Hi, what is your source for this edit - have you surveyed this on the ground? Because someone changed this to 20 mph last month