GinaroZ's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 50078884 | Hi, welcome to OSM. As far as I know we do not map contour lines - probably because it would be a very time consuming and not verifiable.
|
|
| 50007058 | Yes, DigitalGlobe Standard Imagery has the updated layout for half the estate (will need to adjust the imagery offset to about -4.75, 4.25 though). http://product.itoworld.com/product/data/osm_analysis/map_browser?bbox=328639,184583,328868,184825&referrer=area shows road names missing |
|
| 50040594 | Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits.
|
|
| 50031391 | Did you notice the speed limits either side of Newton of Falkland? |
|
| 50014821 | If there is an industrial estate here, might be better adding an area tagged as landuse=industrial instead. |
|
| 49983472 | Where are the paths on either side to get to the bridge?
|
|
| 49947201 | Why did you remove junction=roundabout from this roundabout? way/56133698 |
|
| 49884431 | But you moved them towards the road, so how does help see the road names better? Unless you mean the footway - but these shops are below Victoria Terrace so were correctly placed. |
|
| 49884431 | Hi, just wondering why you moved all of these POIs? Same with the other two edits you made to Edinburgh recently. |
|
| 49767396 | Hi, please do not add features which are already mapped, thanks. |
|
| 49795247 | Thanks for improving the tagging, just a shame the names aren't rendered on the standard layer :( |
|
| 41063829 | I've moved the "tunnel" and improved the road going by OS street view/old OS maps - don't think you'll have much joy with GPS there except in winter.
|
|
| 41063829 | Thanks, was just strange to see a tunnel here, especially with nothing on top of it. Seems like this is it: http://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/139182 |
|
| 41063829 | Is way/433841106/ really a tunnel? |
|
| 49530085 | Hi, I've removed this area. Please use the share option and include a marker if you wish to link to or share an area. |
|
| 49167160 | Thanks for the reply. Just a bit strange as you added it on top of sport pitches :)
|
|
| 37337857 | I'd probably say yes - given they cover a decent area (108, 35 and 25 sq mi) and are fairly important as a step below national parks. Plus there's only 3 of them. While we wait for regional_park to be rendered, the other option is to change them to national park instead of nature reserve, as they have been declared as such by the government (mentioned in the wiki) - or just leave them? Some AONBs seem to have been tagged in England and NI, though perhaps wrongly as national parks? |
|
| 49469000 | wrong changeset comment - should be: "fix junctions" |
|
| 49440641 | Might be worth leaving a comment on the changeset or sending a message to let her know :) |
|
| 49318584 | Should way/438558805 really be primary_link? Can't remember seeing a _link used for an at-grade roundabout before |