Don't vandalise the map. Reverted

way/1379154491 is that meant to be a cycle path as well? (otherwise there's no cycle connection to the road)

It is a statue in OSM, see artwork_type=*

Presumably this is no longer a grass area?

Hmm, not supported by the renderer (that German one has a duplicate taxi area around it), maybe instead there just needs to be a taxi node in between the parking areas to keep it simple? Those are already tagged private so don't need to be in a taxi relation?

Dunno if the two taxi parking/rank areas should be tagged with this one already there?
node/4284836755

I'm guessing meadow/pasture is supposed to be for permanent grass rather than farmland for crops or land that is turned over? I just tagged most things as farmland but I can see that makes sense.

Thanks for editing OSM however these buildings are all wildly inaccurate therefore I have deleted them.

Why did you change these paths to footways and remove the width tags?

Thanks for the reply. Could you give some examples of these apps and how they use the foot tag data? Because surely the default position on foot access on highway=footway is yes - otherwise it wouldn't be much of a footway!

haha yes went onto my YT sub page at the right time, probably should've listed it as a source

Thanks :) (I've changed it to an area and updated the name)
Also I noticed this note if you've not seen it about a possible duplicate you added? note/4556145

node/11832713558 is this actually a post office or just the delivery office?

I've assumed the path you added here was meant to be steps with a step count of 39 and not connected to the motorway...
way/1221187116/history

I mean if they are broken then it would be good to report them to their owner or Glasgow Council so that they can be fixed :)

this has been removed as South Queensferry already has a residential landuse around it

Hi, thanks for fixing the note.
It might be worth having a look at https://www.openstreetbrowser.org/#map=15/55.8431/-4.2806&basemap=osm-mapnik&categories=car_maxspeed to see more missing speed limits, if you are able to survey the area :)

Is this path (and others nearny) actually a cycleway? way/724000965/history

Hi, just wondering what the reason is for adding foot=yes to all these footways?

Shouldn't there be a lifecycle prefix or something as this railway doesn't exist?