Hi there!
I see that you sometimes use highway=yes instead of highway=road. I think highway=yes should no longer be used. Do you have a good reason for that?

I've corrected two of them, the last one is here:
changeset/36931147
Please read again traffic_sign=* regarding the use of highway=traffic_sign on a way / node
and see this changeset
changeset/36875633

Moin!
Schau mal bitte auf
way/26428627
Das Tag
highway=unclassifiedwidth
ist offensichtlich ein Tippfehler, aber unclassified scheint auch falsch.

Why do you have to change existing data "to pick them up" ? I think that's not a good idea unless you say that those roads probably don't exist.

Hi there!
Please check:
What was meant with highway=11 + step_count=7 ?
way/394736057

I've changed them, see
way/394361517

Hi there!
You've created some ways with
highway="pedestrian=proposed"
Please use
highway=proposed + proposed=pedestrian
instead.

Hi Govannus,
please check way
way/394438009
What kind of traffic_sign is this?

Hi Govanus,
please review:
1) a traffic_sign is mapped as a node, not a way, the highway tag is obsolete
2) in this context the direction tag shoud be "forward" or "backward", but it only makes sense when you use traffic_sign=* on a node of a highway

I meant
barrier=central_reservation
as in the example that you referred to. That way has no highway tag, why do you think that it needs one?

If you change it to barrer=* I see no problem.

Yes, why not. There are quite a lot of tags to say that a highway is no longer usable,
abandoned, dismantled, disused,razed etc.
They are either used with highway= or as prefix xxx:highway=*
I don't know what matches here, I am not a local.

Ah, I see. I did not know the in_service tag up to now. Does it mean that the road should be ignored by routing software?
I fear that will not work, better change highway=secondary to
disused:highway=secondary or maybe
highway=construction

Hi there!
You changed three roads from highway=unclassified to the unusual
highway=unset
Was that intended ? If you think that unclassified is wrong, please specify the correct type or use highway=road so that others can check. See also
highway=*

Hi there!
What is meant with highway=clo ?
Was it a typo?
way/26261610

Hi there!
You changed a highway=path
to the unusual highway="cycle route" here.
Was that intended?
way/304087643
Maybe you wanted to change the relation?

Moin und willkommen bei OSM!
Du hast hier einige Wege mit highway=crossing erfaßt. Dieses Tag gehört eigentlich an den Knoten, den sich der Fußweg mit der (Auto-)straße teilt, der Fußweg selbst soll mit
highway=footway + footway=crossing
gemappt werden. Siehe auch
osm.wiki/DE:Key:crossing
viel Spaß beim Mappen weiterhin
Gerd

:-)
Zumindest scheint sich JOSM nicht daran zu stören, wenn highway=* mit building=* kombiniert wird. Ist aber wahrscheinlich schwer, da alle unsinnigen Fälle aufzulisten.
Muss mal schauen, wie das ginge.

Hi there!
You changed a highway=unclassified to highway=* here.
Please check ice_road=*
It suggests to use
ice_road=yes instead of surface=ice_road
and for the highway tag :"its value should reflect importance of the given highway. "
So I guess highway=unclassified was okay.

hmm, so I suggest to remove the way, as we don't copy from other maps. Add it after your visit if it really exists. OK?