Thanks for the quick feedback!
I don't like the name tag, and there is probably no need for the source_2 tag on each object, better is to add this information to the changeset only.
Reg. name: It looks similar to use name=house on a building=house or name=Parking on an amenity=parking.
This is why I stumbled over this changeset because I searched for more cases like the above. The next JOSM release will have new tests to flag such wrong uses of name.
See also https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/17100

Hi! This looks like an import and I wonder if it was discussed?
The tag name=地下式消防栓 looks like a descriptive name. I don't think that this makes sense here.

Hi, I just checked to see the result of the problems discussed in JOSM ticket 17455. Your work flow should be this: Download data, edit, validate, update, upload. Try to keep that cycle short to avoid conflicts. The update step is optional but helps when others edit the same area. Try also Help -> introduction to get some more basics.

Please download the area again and execute JOSM validator (Shift+V). You should find many errors like duplicated ways and duplicated nodes which were created by you.
You also created some invalid turn restrictions. Please reread the wiki about this: osm.wiki/Relation:restriction
In short: The from and to way have to start or end at the via node.
Hope that helps, happy mapping!

Hi!
Please review building inside building:
way/641988224
I guess the inner parts are on top of the larger way? If you want to do 3d mapping please check if buildin:part matches:
osm.wiki/Simple_3D_buildings

Hi nadigatta,
when I changed those roads to tertiary the way/437395676 was also tertiary. Later 437395676 was downgraded to unclassified.
So, yes, tertiary looks wrong for those two ways now. I am not sure if unclassified or residential matches better. I think 518980296 looks like a way that connects small residential areas, so I'd say it is unclassified. The sat image doesn't show clearly whether 437489030 or 437489130 is the continuation of this road.

I've noticed this changeset because of a common typo in more than 26000 nodes:
leaf_type=broadl-leaved
instead of
leaf_type=broadleaved
Why wasn't this cs reverted?

Hi! It seems that iD is not a good choice to do this work. You have messed up a lot of multipolygon relations in this area. Maybe try JOSM instead, it has much better tools to help with that.

Hi!
I see that you map sidewalks like way/633001563
as separate ways instead of simply
adding the sidewalk tag to the major road. Maybe you did not know that option?
sidewalk=*

Hm, mit dieser Änderung hast Du an node/5409796636
jetzt vier TR, aber keine von way/652010910 nach way/570691568
Also zwei zuviel und eine andere zuwenig ;)

Hi uvi,
darf man hier nicht links oder nicht rechts rum?
node/5409796637#map=19/50.82107/13.07499

You can search for an id in JOSM using
id: as prefix, e.g. id:646044410

Ich habe den Weg mal dort gezeichnet, wo ich ihn auf Bing sehe und wieder mit dem originalen Track verbunden. Bing ist hier etwas versetzt, zeigt aber den Weg sehr gut.
Habe dabei dummerweise zuerst die Historie des alten Wegs vernichtet, aber jetzt sollte es passen.
Ansonsten: Wenn man etwas auf einer Luftaufnahme nicht sieht bedeutet das nicht, dass es falsch ist.
Bitte in Zukunft erst mal die anderen Luftaufnahmen anschauen und dann evtl. entweder den Mapper kontaktieren oder ein fixme dranhängen. Luftaufnahmen sind ja auch nie lagegenau und können in den Bergen auch sehr verzerrt sein.
Siehe auch osm.wiki/DE:Luftbilder_verwenden

JOSM produces a warning for untagged ways. If you don't see that warning you may have pressed the ignore button. You can reset these settings when you remove the file %AppData%\\JOSM\validator\ignorederrors

In many countries highway=track also means access=agricultural. You may use smoothness=*, see smoothness=*

Why didn't you improve the position?

Oops, forgot a link to an example:
way/646077758

Hi!
You mapped a few ways with highway=sidewalk here. The normal tagging would be highway=footway + footway=sidewalk, but I think there is no need to map those sidewalks with separate ways. You can use the sidewalk tag, see sidewalk=*

Hi! I've noticed this changeset because of the unusual tag highway=ruins. Did you mean historic=ruins?

Hi! Please check typo highway=p
way/646095039
I don't see a highway there.

Hallo!
Was ist mit highway=access gemeint?
Für mich sieht das nach einem highway=service aus.
way/151176163